Rohatgi concludes his arguments saying "I respectfully submit that this case is for bail".
Rohatgi : I filed a rejoinder saying that I am not making any allegations against the officers or panchas & I have no connection with them.
Rohatgi says he denies all allegations in the NCB's reply.
"I deny everything. I am not making allegations against any officer or anybody", he says.
Rohatgi : This case has attracted public and media gaze because of his parents. Unsavory controversy between political personalities and NCB cannot rub off on me.
Rohatgi- There is no question of conscious possession. Arbaaz is not my servant, he is not in my control.
Rohatgi is now referring to Bombay High Court's judgement in Prajesh Vaghani vs State of Maha on conscious possession.
Rohatgi says that the Supreme Court held in Ragini Dwivedi's case that the bar for bail under 37 of NDPS Acr would not apply.
Rohatgi - Ragini's case the SC held that at best it was a case of consumption.
Rohatgi refers to para 7 of the Ragini Dwivedi judgment in which the SC granted bail. No drugs were found and the applicant was arrested on a conspiracy charge, he says.
Rohatgi now cites the judgement of Supreme Court Ragini Dwivedi vs State of Karnataka.