Top Stories

BCI urges discontinuation of protest against Chief Justice of MP High Court

Apoorva Mandhani
12 Feb 2015 5:08 AM GMT
BCI urges discontinuation of protest against Chief Justice of MP High Court
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Bar Council of India has urged the Advocates' Association of Jabalpur High Court and District Bar Association to discontinue their agitation against Chief Justice A.M. Khanwilkar. BCI has refused to lend any kind of support to the protest, considering it as an effort to lay unwarranted pressure on the Judiciary.

Responding to their appeal chairman of Bar Council of India said, "I have come to know that the Bar council of MP has given some call to boycott the courts of some judges of high court. I have also been informed that it is with some mal-intent of a few members in order to lay undue pressure upon the high court. If there is something genuine, it is concern of bar association not of bar council.”

Last month, more than one lakh lawyers from the MP High Court and lower courts in Madhya Pradesh abstained from Courts to protest against the radical changes made by Chief Justice A.M. Khanwilkar to reform the judicial machinery.

While the introduction of roster system last year was being seen as the major bone of contention between the CJ and the lawyers, the recent incident of penalizing a fellow advocate in Jabalpur for filing a PIL acted as trigger for them for staging the statewide protest in February.

The MP HC administration had issued a memorandum on November 5, 2014 to District and Sessions Judge across the State, directing them to clear the ever mounting backlog of cases, by placing a deadline for cases which have been pending for five year or more, as on October 1, 2014. The deadline was placed as March 31.

Further, the memorandum had instructed District and Sessions Judges that all cases must be disposed off within a time frame and on priority basis by the Judicial Officers, by avoiding unnecessary adjournments. The failure to do so would result in an adverse entry to be entered in their confidential report by the District and Sessions Judges.

The memorandum also called for a monthly evaluation of disposal of cases, at the High Court level by the case management committee, with a view to issue necessary directions, to the concerned as and when required.

Agitated by the move, the lawyers had said that they would approach the Chief Justice of India for the MP Chief Justice’s immediate removal.

Next Story