Bombay HC Finds POCSO Judge Biased Against Accused, Transfers The Case [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC Finds POCSO Judge Biased Against Accused, Transfers The Case [Read Judgment]

The single bench of Justice AM Badar of the Bombay High Court has allowed the application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act(POCSO) to transfer his case before another judge alleging bias on part of the current designated under the said act.

Court was hearing the application filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(CPC) wherein the accused applicant alleged that despite orders of the High Court for adjournment of the ongoing trial on July 11, 2016 the POCSO judge imposed costs upon the accused for seeking adjournment. Rs.3000 was made payable to the victim.

High Court had directed the POCSO court to adjourn the hearing in the case till the criminal writ petition filed by the accused challenging the charges framed against him, however POCSO judge did not adhere to these orders. Justice Badar held that the POCSO judge proceeded to record certain things in his orders despite an order of adjournment pending disposal of the said criminal writ petition.

Referring to the orders of the trial judge, Justice Badar states – “What is required is the impression that a litigant receives in the wake of the facts recorded.” He further stated – “I am of the opinion that the applicant/accused is holding bona fide and reasonable apprehension of bias that the learned trial judge is prejudiced against him and he may not get a fair trial.”

Holding the apprehension of bias in the mind of the applicant/accused as reasonable, genuine and justifiable the case has now been directed to be transferred to “any other judge designated under the POCSO Act 2012 for Greater Bombay.”

Read the Judgment here.



This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.