Top Stories

Breaking: Bombay HC Finds Prima Facie Case Of Contempt Against JOLLY LLB 2, Orders Committee To Submit Report

Nitish Kashyap
30 Jan 2017 1:49 PM GMT
Breaking: Bombay HC Finds Prima Facie Case Of Contempt Against JOLLY LLB 2, Orders Committee To Submit Report
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

In a surprising development, a division bench of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has held that prima facie there appears to be a case of contempt against the upcoming film Jolly LLB 2.

The bench headed by Justice VM Kanade has ordered a three member committee to be formed for a review of the movie to examine whether a case of contempt can be made out against the movie. The committee will comprise of two Senior Counsels and one member of the society who is not in the legal profession.

Previously, the bench had issued a notice to Fox Star Studios, producers of the upcoming film, directing them to file an affidavit in reply. In the meantime the bench decided to examine two trailers of the film that have already been released on social media and other media platforms.

The bench was hearing a writ petition filed by Advocate Ajay Waghmare. This petition has now been ordered to be converted into a Public Interest Litigation.

In his petition, Waghmare has sought LLB to be dropped from the main title of the film as the film itself is “a deliberate attempt to malign the judiciary”.

Petitioner had alleged that there are scenes in the movie that are an attempt to malign the reputation of the judges who “dispense justice as a sacred duty”. A contempt notice was sought to be issued to the makers of the film on account of “derogative insult and attempt to tarnish the image and reputation of Indian Judiciary and the Legal profession.”

This comes as a surprising development because a similar petition was filed against the first part of the film in SC, Jolly LLB in 2013 by lawyers from Meerut. The Supreme Court while dismissing the petition had said– “Don’t watch Jolly LLB if it offends you.” On the fictitious nature of films, ex-CJI RM Lodha who was then heading the bench had observed-  “These things happen in movies. They show Bombay High Court’s door and gate and then show something else happening inside. These are all fictitious things.”

However, the bench observed today that after reviewing the prequel to Jolly LLB 2, prima facie there seems to be a scandalizing element in the present movie.

The three member committee will now submit a report on February 3 which is the next date of hearing. Lawyers appearing for both parties refused to answer any questions.

This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.

Next Story