Top Stories

Breaking: Centre Would Not Contest S.377 IPC, Says 'Let The Court Decide'

Apoorva Mandhani
11 July 2018 6:49 AM GMT
Breaking: Centre Would Not Contest S.377 IPC, Says
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

In a welcome move, the Centre today informed the Supreme Court that it would not contest the petitions challenging Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code as far as they relate to consensual sex between two adults.

Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that the Centre has decided to leave the issue to the wisdom of the Court. He, however, requested the Court to not decide on the corollary rights of the LGBTQ community, such as those related to their marriage.

The Centre’s affidavit said, “Considering the issues, if any, if permitted to be raised beyond the scope of the reference, the same would require a detailed counter affidavit showing legitimate state interest on various other issues. Such an exercise could obviously not be undertaken without wider consultations in the government.

In the most respectful submission of the Union of India, allowing any other issue (other than constitutional validity of Section 377) to be argued and adjudicating the same with giving an opportunity to the Union of India to file a counter affidavit to the Union of India may not be in the interest of justice and would be violative of principles of natural justice.”

To this, Justice Chandrachud assured Mr. Mehta that the Court was not considering civil rights of homosexual persons, but was only examining the need to de-criminalise consensual sex between adults.

Centre’s stand comes as a surprise, as speculations were rife about it taking a different stand after Attorney General KK Venugopal said that he would not appear for the Centre in the case. He had reportedly reasoned that he had earlier appeared in the curative petition filed against the 2013 Supreme Court decision but the Centre is taking a different stand now, necessitating his withdrawal.

Next Story