SC Agrees To Hear Priya Varrier's Plea For Quashing Criminal Proceedings Relating To The Song “Manikya Malaraya Poovi” Tomorrow
The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra on Tuesday agreed the plea for urgent hearing of the writ petition filed by actress Priya Varrier and the director of the Malayalam film ‘Oru Adaar Love’, Omar Abdul Vahab, seeking the quashing of the FIR registered in the state of Telangana and the criminal complaints in Maharashtra by the Raza Academy and a group of persons under the aegis of the Jan Jagran Samiti for allegedly hurting the religious sentiments of Muslims.
Advocate Haris Beeran mentioned the matter before the Chief Justice today.The petition is scheduled for hearing on Wednesday
The entire controversy which has resulted in the filing of the criminal complaints and one FIR arises from the lyrics of the song “Manikya Malaraya Poovi” which is a Mappila song, or a traditional Muslim song from the Malabar region of Kerala. The song describes and praises the love between the Prophet Mohamed and his first wife Khadeeja.
The petitioners have told the apex court in the petition filed through advocate Haris Beeran and Pallavi Pratap that the “criminal complaints have been instituted by various fringe groups based on a distorted and incorrect interpretation of the Song in the states of Telangana, Maharashtra and similar complaints are likely from other non-Malayalam speaking states as well”.
The petition says that the song has its origin in an old folk song from Kerala penned in 1978 by PMA Jabbar, which was first sung by Thalassery Rafeeq, in the praise of the Prophet and his wife Beevi Khadija. “The claims that it hurts the religious sentiments of the Muslim community are without any basis. What is hard to fathom is that a song which has been in existence for the past 40 years, which was written, sung and cherished by the Muslim community in Kerala is now being treated as an insult to the Prophet and his wife,” say the petitioners.
The petitioners have averred that in view of the threat to the life of the young actress and her family, the FIR and criminal complaints are violative of Article 21. It is also contended that the registration of the said FIR and complaints constitutes an infringement of Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g).
The petitioners have relied on the recent judgments of the apex court in Viacom 18 Media v. UOI (the ‘Padmaavat’ case), Nachiketa Walhekar v. CBFC (regarding the documentary on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal) and S. Khushboo v. Kannaiamal (2010).
A direction prohibiting the states against initiating any criminal proceedings or registering any complaint or FIR on the ground that the lyrics of the song have violated the religious sentiment of a particular community has also been sought.