3 Oct 2016 9:13 AM GMT
The Supreme Court today said may not want any community to be ridiculed through jokes or SMSs or its commercialization but wondered even if it banned or issued some orders pertaining to it, how could it be enforced?Carrying forward the hearing on PILs seeking a ban on ‘sardar jokes’, a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur asked petitioner and lawyer Harvinder Choudury...
The Supreme Court today said may not want any community to be ridiculed through jokes or SMSs or its commercialization but wondered even if it banned or issued some orders pertaining to it, how could it be enforced?
Carrying forward the hearing on PILs seeking a ban on ‘sardar jokes’, a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur asked petitioner and lawyer Harvinder Choudury and Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (DGSMC): “Tell us if we were to issue any direction how can they be enforced? If we say no sikh jokes, how is it to be implemented. Come up with ideas on that within four weeks”.
“Yes commercial exploitation of it can definitely be controlled and once we issue some order, other communities may also come forward like south of the Vindhyas, every one is termed Madrasis and there are also jokes about their community, they will say ...and come to the court but how do we enforce such orders?” asked the CJI.
The bench asked a panel of experts headed by some retired judges who are looking into the issue of framing guidelines to look into this aspect also.
The DSGMC had said earlier “Certain type of jokes are hurting us. It is not only the sikhs. It covers Biharis and also people from the north east also. We may be enjoying jokes and also cracking jokes ourselves. But do not want to become jokes ourselves”
They said we have contributed a lot, we have had a Sikh President, PM, still we are ridiculed, Then CJI Thakur chipped into say “yes ..we also had a chief of army staff also you will be soon getting a Sikh CJI also”. Thakur was referring Justice J S Khehar, the second senior most judge of the apex court who will succeed Thakur in early next year.
On the first day of hearing on October 31, last year initially the court was in a mood to dismiss the petition till Chowdhury, the original petitioner belonging to the community, primafacie convinced the court that it was a matter worth serious hearing and the issue was related to the prestige of the community.
She argued that such jokes amounted to humiliating and insulting the Sikh community.
"Why should we ban such a thing? The community is known for its great sense of humour..they enjoy the jokes ..did author Khushwant Singh not write jokes on Sikhs? And, he was a sardar. Perhaps the Sikh community will object to the banning of these jokes on the Internet", justice Thakur told Chowdhury.
Justice Thakur had then even consulted senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who was present in the courtroom in connection with another case if he felt the court should at all proceed with the PIL. Singhvi replied: "In my opinion, the community takes such jokes very sportingly."
This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.