News Updates

Conflicting Reports about Govt. approval of appointment of HC Judges flood leading dailies

Apoorva Mandhani
20 Oct 2015 2:44 PM GMT
Conflicting Reports about Govt. approval of appointment of HC Judges flood leading dailies
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Eager to comment and analyze the effects of the National Judicial Appointments Commission being declared unconstitutional, news agencies are flooded with conflicting reports of the Government response to the recommendations of the SC collegium.

TOI reported that the Centre has sent for President’s assent, the names of 24 Additional Judges, in six High Courts of the country. It reported that Union Law Minister V. Sadananda Gowda promised the CJI that the Government would send the files to the President for his signature.

The CJI was quoted as saying, “It was my moral duty to see that these 24 additional judges did not suffer uncertainty because the Supreme Court is on Dussehra break.” Some of these Additional Judges were to face an expiration of term this week and hence, the situation demanded an urgent response from the CJI as well as the Government.

Therefore, the TOI report negates any claims of a stand-off between the judiciary and the Government, post the NJAC verdict. The Hindu supported the TOI report and quoted the Law Minister as saying, “This was only a recommendation for a six-month extension for the 24 judges. Their terms were going to expire on October 24. If nothing was done, they would have gone home. We cannot afford to do that as there are already so many vacancies.”

While all was amiable according to the TOI report, DNA has reported that the Government has returned 21 files sent by the SC collegium for confirmation of High Court Judges. The Government only cleared the appointment of one Bombay High Court Additional Judge for another two years. These files, it said, were among more than 100 recommendations made by the SC collegium, before the NJAC was notified in April this year.

The two reports however, agreed on the aspect of the SC collegium sending the names of the Additional Judges for approval. Refuting this assertion, an NDTV report claimed that in an interview to them, CJI Dattu said he would consult other judges “to decide on the filling of vacancies, or wait till November 3 -- the next hearing of the case seeking suggestions to improve the collegium system.”

The conflicting reports intensify the debate regarding the proposed effects of the NJAC being declared unconstitutional. Immediately after the verdict, CJI Dattu had put the collegium machinery into motion, in view of the expiring terms of several Additional Judges in various High Courts of the country.

According to a PIB release yesterday President appointed Justice Tinlianthang Vaiphei as Acting Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court. It is also reported that the term of Justice Vijay Lakhichand Achliya’s term as Additional Judge of Bombay High Court also extended

With the vacancies in the High Courts of the country reaching 39%, clarity on the issue of appointments is paramount. We can merely hope for a more prudent attitude from the Government’s end in view of the dismal straits of the High Courts of the country.

Next Story