Click Here To Read LiveLaw Hindi- The First Hindi Legal News Website

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor Introduces Anti-Discrimination And Equality Bill In Lok Sabha [Read The Bill]

Shashi Tharoor, MP, introduced the Anti-Discrimination and Equality Bill 2016 in Lok Sabha on March 10.

In the Statement of Objects and Reasons, attached to the Bill, Shashi Tharoor says as follows:

“The Constitution of India promises justice, liberty, equality and fraternity to all our citizens.

However, discrimination denies these cherished constitutional promises. Cases of discrimination continue to be witnessed in all spheres of social, economic and political life. They are frequently directed against dalits, muslims, women, persons of different sexual orientations ‘hijras’ persons with disabilities, persons from North-Eastern States unmarried couples and non-vegetarians, among others.

There is a need to protect everyone who are subject to all forms of unfair discrimination under a single comprehensive legislation which should be neutral and free from bias. Although it is normally minorities that are at the receiving end of discrimination, the law, in order to be sound, should encompass all citizens. It must protect both minorities as well as majorities, which is the intention of this Bill.

Existing constitutional protections against discrimination under articles 14, 15, 16 and 17 are not sufficient and need to be strengthened with additional statutory protections in order to realize their intended purpose. The constitutional directives under articles 38, 39 and 46, as well as the Fundamental Duty of all citizens under clauses (c) and (e) of article 51A are also intended towards ensuring equality among all.

Group membership is celebrated in a vibrant and pluralistic society such as ours, but the law must ensure that no citizen is discriminated against or put to a disadvantage on account of membership of certain groups. There is also a need to encourage diversity and affirmative action so long as such discrimination exists, including within the State’s rosters of employment and in its various instruments.

Instead of merely mandating punishment for offences we must simultaneously engender greater understanding and empathy within the system among the individuals who constitute that system. It is also noted that India is at present an exception among liberal democracies for not enacting a comprehensive law against discrimination, covering both the public and the private sectors.

It must be recognized that membership of a group should never adversely affect a citizen’s life, and that there is a need to protect all groups and citizens from discrimination in the interests of national unity and diversity”.

Dr.Tarunabh Khaitan, who  is an Associate Professor and the Hackney Fellow in Law at Wadham College, Oxford University, U.K., and on whose advice, Tharoor has drafted the Bill, said:

“The Bill is an effort to respond, among other events, to Rohith Vemula’s tragic suicide, which has put the need for an antidiscrimination legislation back on the political agenda. India is amongst the few regimes with a constitutional commitment to a liberal democracy that nevertheless lack a comprehensive, multi-ground, antidiscrimination legislation.

The Bhopal Declaration issued in 2002 seeking to chart a new course for Dalits welcomed ‘winds of change the world over’ towards inclusion and diversity and against discrimination. A conversation on the need and shape of an antidiscrimination law began after the Sachar Committee recommended it in 2006.

While the UPA government did briefly consider setting up an Equal Opportunity Commission, the idea was quietly buried. Anti discrimination law remains a key demand of groups representing women, gays, lesbians, transgendered persons, and persons living with disability. The policy debate on an anti discrimination law has been going on for about a decade. It is hoped that the existence of a draft Bill will give concrete shape to this conversation and draw attention to details.”

The Bill seeks to protect minorities and majorities from unfair discrimination.

Professor Khaitan has expressed the hope that the Lok Sabha will now send the Bill to a standing committee for wider scrutiny and revision in light of a broad public consultation.

Read the Bill here.

Got Something To Say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

  • Dr Maj U C Panigrahi says:

    The fact that Mr Tharoor had to introduce such a bill is reason enough to believe that there is ample inequality by following the constitutional provisions in its breach.
    The most glaring inequality is that meted out in denying opportunity as per merit/eligibility/even level playing field to the 75 crore(>50%) of the so called GENERAL(UPPER CASTE) category for 67 years through numerous aberrations/amendments/interpretations to the original EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO ALL in the preamble.

    • Prof Col Retd Dr M Azam says:

      The very fact that we divide citizens with so called General or others itself is discriminatory and fraud on democracy Merit has been allegedly hijacked . Majority in democracy misunderstood as majority outside the Parliament or legislatures and being manipulated. The Bill introduced is at right time to establish equality enshrined in the constitution of India .

  • Sanjay Bhatia says:

    Hold on a second. LGBT And Divyang given special mention I can understand. Why does “Muslims” receive special mention here. There are other minorities who number far less. Also Shashi Tharoor being a Congress member still toes the line of Minority read Muslim appeasement which has damaged not only the secular fabric of the nation but also relegated them in particular to suffering from lack of development and equal opportunities. By handing out sops subsidies et all their participation in the mainstream has been sabotaged by congress under the guise of ironically “Helping them Integrate”

    • Prof Col Retd Dr M Azam says:

      This is the right Bill for a right law at right time. Mainstream needs constitutional definition and not as and imagination .
      There cannot be all happy situation to a group in democracy and deny others even the crumbs of Indian cake

Top