15 May 2017 1:02 PM GMT
People are increasingly making their personal information available publically. Today there is an unprecedented amount of personal data available with Government and Private Sector Players. Digital India, Aadhaar and Demonetization drives have added to the already growing pool of personal data with various public and private players to pursue their activities. Indian law does not define...
People are increasingly making their personal information available publically. Today there is an unprecedented amount of personal data available with Government and Private Sector Players. Digital India, Aadhaar and Demonetization drives have added to the already growing pool of personal data with various public and private players to pursue their activities. Indian law does not define personal data. The same has been defined by EU’s general data protection guidelines [REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL] as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. From this definition it is clear that personal information includes biometric and economic information as well.
Publically available personal information pose a greater risk for Indians because majority of population is illiterate and there is no law mandating data protection. Individuals are repeatedly transmitting their personal information for various activities. Aspects such as the purpose for collecting personal information, how will this information be used, security mechanisms put in place for protecting such information , for how long will this information be stores, what will be the procedure for destroying such information etc are not known by the individual nor have these aspects been defined uniformly in any law. India’s has no specific legislation focusing on data protection. A few principles of data protection are scattered through IT Act, Guidelines issued by RBI, TRAI etc.
Any kind of processing of personal data should be fair and transparent. Providers of personal information should be made aware of risks, rules, safeguards and rights in relation to the processing of personal data and how to exercise their rights in relation to such processing. Particularly, the specific purposes for which personal data is processed should be explicit and legitimate and determined at the time of the collection of the personal data. Personal data should be processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security and confidentiality of the personal data, including for preventing unauthorised access to or use of personal data and the equipment used for the processing. Basic principles guiding processing of Personal data are as follows:-
It can be seen from above that protection of personal data and Right to privacy are intrinsically linked. Only a strong emphasis on the right to privacy can ensure that personal data is not shared or leaked incessantly without any checks. It is duty of the State to ensure individual autonomy. However, in recent times the very concept of the individual autonomy is also at risk. Right to privacy has its roots in the law of tort under which any unlawful invasion of privacy gave a cause of action for damages. The right to privacy has two aspects involved (1) unlawful invasion to privacy affords a tort action for damages resulting from an unlawful invasion of privacy and (2) the constitutional recognition given to the right to privacy which protects personal privacy against unlawful governmental invasion. The first aspect of this right must be said to have been violated where, for example, a person's name or likeness is used, without his consent, for advertising or non-advertising purposes or for that matter, his life story is written whether laudatory or otherwise and published without his consent as explained hereinafter. In recent times, however, this right has acquired a constitutional status. It is not enumerated as a fundamental right but has been read into Article 21. The Indian courts have to be thanked for the right to privacy’s development and evolution through the years. The first decision on right to privacy was Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. Since then the concept has evolved with every invasion to privacy.
While collecting information directly from the person concerned the body corporate has to ensure that the person concerned has knowledge of the fact that information is being collected, purpose for which the information is collected, intended recipients of information and the name and address of the agency that is collecting the information and the agency that will retain the information. The Body corporate can collect sensitive personal data or information only for its lawful function and collection of information is considered necessary for that purpose. Data relating to sensitive information can be retained for such time as is required for the purpose of collecting such information or is required by any law. Such information can be used the collected information only for the purpose for which the information has been collected.
Personal data cannot be disclosed to a third party without the consent of the provider except in the following cases:-
The body corporates handling personal sensitive information should have reasonable security practices in place [Rule 8, Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011]. International Standard IS/ISO/IEC 27001 on “Information Technology-Security Techniques – Information Security Management System- Requirements” is one such standard. Body Corporates who have implemented IS/ISO/IEC 27001 standards or other best practices are deemed to comply with reasonable security standards.
Apart from these generic rules the Aadhaar Act [The Aadhaar (Targeted delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016] provides for specific protection of biometric data given to obtain Aadhar number by an individual. The Aadhaar Act mandates that the Unique Identification Authority of India (hereinafter Authority) shall ensure security and confidentiality of identity information and authentication records of individuals. Sharing of core biometric information and its use for any purpose other than generation of Aadhaar numbers and authentication is prohibited. Identity Information available with a requesting entity cannot be used for any purpose other than that specified to the individual at the time of submitting any identity information for authentication. Such Identity Information cannot be disclosed further, except with the prior consent of the individual. However, such restrictions regarding confidentiality do not apply in respect of any disclosure of information made pursuant to an order of a court not inferior to that of a District Judge and incase disclosure is required in the interest of national security in pursuance of direction of an officer not below the rank of Joint Secretary to the Government of India [Section 33 , The Aadhaar (Targeted delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016]. Rule 22 of the Aadhaar (Enrolment and Update) Regulations, 2016 provides that the following measures for ensuring Data Security. It is mandatory for requesting entities and authentication Service Agencies to have their servers used for Aadhaar authentication request formation and routing to CIDR to be located within data centers located in India. Authentication Service Agency are required to establish dual redundant, secured leased lines or MPLS connectivity with the data centres of the Authority. Requesting entities shall use appropriate license keys to access the authentication facility provided by the Authority only through an ASA over secure network.
Both IT Act and Aadhaar Act impose penalty for default however the penalty imposed is very less as compared to the importance of information. The penalty is supposed to deter any unauthorized action however, this penalty will have little or no deterrence. Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy has also highlighted that these data protection laws are inadequate. On the international front several countries have enacted data protection laws such as Canada, U.K., and Australia etc. One comprehensive piece on data protection are the EU’s general data protection regulations. It regards protection of personal data as a fundamental right. This right is however not an absolute right. It must be considered in relation to its function in society and be balanced against other fundamental rights, in accordance with the principle of proportionality. This concept of proportionality has also recognized by Indian law in the Aadhaar act wherein national security is carved out as an exception to the rule of non-disclosure of identity information. IT Act also allows similar disclosures to Government agencies mandated under the law to obtain information for the purpose of verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation including cyber incidents, prosecution and punishment of offences. The Government agency in such cases cannot share or publish the information received with any other person.
IT Act and Aadhaar Act leave certain open ended issues such as what can be termed as personal data, treatment of personal information of deceased person, right to be forgotten, the differentiation between data controller and data processor and their respective obligations towards data subjects have not been provided. It is for this reason there is a need to have a uniform stringent law protecting personal data. Data protection laws have gained greater significance today, especially when India is marching towards complete digitization.
The data protection law should be equally applicable on public and the private sector. Today, personal information is not only being held by the Government. It is increasingly being held by private players such telecom companies, banks etc. This law should be applicable to natural persons irrespective of their nationality and residence. Similarly it should equally apply to processors/controllers of personal data of Indian citizens situated in India or situated abroad. The protection afforded should be applicable to both manual as well as automated methods of data processing. Specific exceptions should be carved out where data is being shared solely for personal reasons such as social networking or is needed for purposes of national security and integrity. At the same time the law should ensure that the service providers providing a medium of exchange of data for personal reasons shall be bound not to disclose or use such information. It should be ensured that data provider’s consent for disclosure in all cases should be an affirmative and informed act. Silence or inactivity or consent through overload of information should not constitute consent. There is a need to have standards for maintenance of records with respect to processing of data, method of notification of data breach and standard operating procedure in case of such breaches. Complaint mechanisms need to be defined wherever personal data is involved. In order to ensure that the personal data are not kept longer than necessary, time limits should be established by the controller for erasure or for a periodic review. Every reasonable step should be taken to ensure that personal data personal data is secure and the data controller/processor are held accountable for every breach.
Srishti Saxena is working as an Assistant Manager (Legal) in Goods and Services Tax Network.