Top
Editors Pick

Even a Foreign Citizen is entitled to recover immediate possession of building owned him under Punjab Tenancy Law: HC [Read Judgment]

Ashok KM
11 May 2016 3:52 AM GMT
Even a Foreign Citizen is entitled to recover immediate possession of building owned him under Punjab Tenancy Law: HC [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that even a foreign citizen or a person who was born outside India could be covered under the definition of Non Resident Indian for the purpose of Tenancy laws in Punjab.

Justice Ajay Tewari made this observation while passing orders in a batch of petition by tenants against landlords. Section 13-B of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 deals with Right of Non-resident Indians to recover immediate possession of buildings owned by them. The primary contention adopted was that the use of the terms 'settled' and 'return' in the statute, implies that NRI includes only such a person who has gone from India and could not be held applicable to a person who was born abroad.

Rejecting the contention as flawed the court observed “It is not necessary that to 'settle' one must arrive; a person who is born abroad can also be covered under the clause 'permanently or temporarily settled'. Likewise a person who travels to his place of origin (albeit for the first time in his life) can always be said to 'return'.”

The court also rejected the argument that a foreign citizen or a person who was born outside India could not be covered under the definition of NRI for the purpose of the Rent Act.

Read the Judgment here.

Next Story