Executing Memon; Gross Travesty of justice; Former Judges and Jurists [Read the Petition]

Simran Sahni

26 July 2015 5:29 PM GMT

  • Executing Memon; Gross Travesty of justice; Former Judges and Jurists [Read the Petition]

    Yakub Memon is scheduled to be hanged on July 30 at Nagpur Central Prison after his curative petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The apex court would hear on Monday his plea for a stay on his execution. Read the LiveLaw story here.Justice Dave had led the Bench which in April dismissed Memon’s petition for a review of his death penalty. It was after this that he had...

    Yakub Memon is scheduled to be hanged on July 30 at Nagpur Central Prison after his curative petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The apex court would hear on Monday his plea for a stay on his execution. Read the LiveLaw story here.

    Justice Dave had led the Bench which in April dismissed Memon’s petition for a review of his death penalty. It was after this that he had moved a curative plea before the apex court. That petition was also dismissed for lack of merit earlier this week by a Bench led by the Chief Justice Dattu and which also included Justice Dave. However, on June 23, Memon again moved the Supreme Court seeking stay of execution of his death sentence. The court further clubbed an application by the Death Penalty Litigation Clinic associated with National Law University, Delhi.

    Former Supreme Court judge Justice Markandey Katju today said that there has been "gross travesty of justice" in the case of Yakub Memon. He said, "This evidence is retracted confession of the co-accused and alleged recoveries," alleging it as a very weak stand.

    “The cooperation of Yakub with the investigating agencies after he was picked up informally in Kathmandu and his role in persuading some other members of the family to come out of Pakistan and surrender constitute, in my view, a strong mitigating circumstance to be taken into consideration while considering whether the death penalty should be implemented,” B Raman(former Additional Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat) wrote in an unpublished article, reviewed by The Indian Express two days ago.

    Supreme Court judge Justice Harjit Singh Bedi in a letter to The Indian Express stated clearly his reasons against the imposition of death penalty, emphasising on the fact that all mitigating factors in favour of an accused facing a capital sentence must be put before the court and that this obligation rests equally on the prosecution as well, which was not the case here. In February 2013, Justice K.T.Thomas, who was part of the Bench which sentenced the assassins of Rajiv Gandhi to death said it would be "constitutionally incorrect" to hang them

    Senior lawyer KTS Tulsi said that the government should reconsider Yakub Memon's mercy petition. He added by saying, "I think it (mercy petition) should be reconsidered, he has rendered us valuable help in being able to collect evidence against Pakistan." "He (Yakub) gave us very valuable inputs, which were verified and found to be correct.. The nation should show gratitude to this man for having given us valuable evidence, there seems to be genuine turn of heart in him." The senior lawyer's comments came after Bollywood actor Salman Khan in a controversial tweet said that Yakub Memon should not be hanged as the real culprit is the latter's brother Tiger Memon.

    The Times of India quoted the home department, led by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis stating, "All the issues raised by Yakub in his fresh mercy petition have been raised in his mercy petition before the President of India and curative petition before the apex court. Since his mercy petition as well as curative petition has been dismissed, we do not see any substance in his fresh mercy petition. As such, we feel that it should be dismissed.”

    The Hindu today published the text of a petition submitted to President Pranab Mukherjee on Sunday by a group of eminent jurists, MPs, leaders of political parties and eminent individuals from different walks of life, requesting him to consider the mercy plea against the execution of the death sentence of Yakub Memon. The signatories include Senior Jurist and Rajya Sabha Member Ramjethmalani.

    Here is the full text of the Petition

    His Excellency,
    The Hon’ble President of India
    Rashtrapati Bhavan,
    New Delhi
    Subject: New Mercy Petition Urging Stay Against Imminent Execution of Yakub Abdul Razak Memon
    May it Please Your Excellency:
    This is a mercy petition for Yakub Abdul Razak Memon, who is scheduled to be executed on 30 July 2015 as per the execution warrant issued by the TADA Court.
    We, the undersigned, through this petition urge Your Excellency to stay the imminent execution so that the substantive and fresh grounds raised herein can be considered on merits.

    A. Preliminary Grounds
    1. An International Commitment to abolish death penalty – We the signatories of this mercy petition humbly make the statement that in India death penalty cannot be imposed till such time Parliament of India decides not to abolish death penalty and the reason for the same are as under:
    The universal declaration of Human Rights adopted by the General Assembly on 10.12.1948 defined certain human rights and fundamental freedoms which need to be protected. Among the subsequent human right documents, the most important are the two covenants adopted by the General Assembly in 1966: The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocol and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. India became a party to both these covenant by ratifying them on 27.3.1979. There are two optional protocols to the covenant, the Second Protocol aims at the abolition of death penalty.
    Article VI of Part-III of the covenant on civil and political rights lays down as under:
    1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No-one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.
    2. In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crime.
    3. ……………….
    4. Anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of the sentence amnesty or commutation of death may be granted in all cases.
    The President of India under Article 72 of the Constitution of India has the power to grant pardon and to suspend, remit or commute sentence in certain cases. It is in this way the constitution of India permits right of appeal. Sub-clause of Article 6 of Part-III of the Covenant as referred above provides that commutation of sentence of death may be granted in all cases. In the circumstance, we will have to understand as to why “may” has been used for commutation of the sentence of death to be granted by the President. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Deewan Singh Vs. Rajendra Prasad Ardevi (2007) 10 SC 528 while interpretating “may” where powers is conferred upon a public authority coupled with direction, the word “may” which connotes direction should be constitute to mean a command. In India this power of pardon is to be exercised by the President and therefore under no circumstances for empowering the President the word “shall” could have been used in the covenant but it means a command i.e. commutation of sentence of death must be granted in all cases by President, till such time Parliament of India decides that it will continue the penalty of death sentence. After signing of covenant, the Parliament of India has not considered any amendment in the Indian Penal Code for abolition of death sentence.
    The second optional protocol to the International covenant on civil and political rights reads as under:
    “The States Parties to the present Protocol,
    Believing that abolition of the death penalty contributes to enhancement of human dignity and progressive development of human rights,
    Recalling Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted on 10 December 1948, and Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted on 16 December 1966,
    Noting that Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights refers to abolition of the death penalty in terms that strongly suggest that abolition is desirable,
    Convinced that all measures of abolition of the death penalty should be considered as progress in the enjoyment of the right to life,
    Desirous to undertake hereby an international commitment to abolish the death penalty,
    Have agreed as follows:
    Article 1:
    1. No one within the jurisdiction of a State Party to the present Protocol shall be executed.
    2. Each State Party shall take all necessary measures to abolish the death penalty within its jurisdiction.
    Article 2:
    1. No reservation is admissible to the present Protocol, except for a reservation made at the time of ratification or accession that provides for the application of the death penalty in time of war pursuant to a conviction for a most serious crime of a military nature committed during wartime.”

    As regards covenant we may submit that a covenant is a treaty and it lays down a notable step forward in the protection of human rights within the framework of the United Nations and constitutes the basic provisions of International Bill of Rights. The two covenants also demonstrate the way in which the United Nations is overcoming its earlier hesitations about the enforcement of human rights obligations. It is almost an accepted provision of law that rules of customary International Law which are not contrary to Municipal Law shall be deemed to be incorporated in the domestic law.
    The plea of enforceability of various International covenant is now no longer a matter of debate but should be considered to be firmly established as a part of international law which the domestic courts are duty bound to give effect to.

    2. Present Petition Meets Procedural Requirements

    This Mercy Petition satisfies the legal requirements applicable to a fresh mercy petition as per G. KrishtaGoud v. State of A.P., (1976) 1 SCC 157para10 and clause VII-(A) of the Procedure Regarding Petitions for Mercy in Death Sentence Cases, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
    3. Death Warrant fixing the date of Execution is Illegal

    Yakub Memon was not given advance notice of the death warrant hearing and as a result of which he and his lawyers could not participate and contest the issuance of the death warrant. Lack of hearing makes the present death warrant void in light of the Supreme Court decision in Shabnam v. Union of India &Ors, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 88 of 2015 (decided on May 27, 2015).

    B. Fresh Grounds on Merits

    Following are some very disturbing aspects of this case which make the award of death sentence of Yakub Memon as grossly unfair, arbitrary and excessive.
    1. Long Duration of Trial and Incarceration Suffered Till Date

    Yakub Memon has served more than 20 years in prison since his arrest. His trial took 14 years to complete. While the Hon'ble Supreme Court used this long period of incarceration as a mitigating circumstance to commute the death sentences of the other 10 co-accused persons, it applied a different yardstick to Yakub. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has repeatedly held that lengthy incarceration during pendency of appeal in death cases is a significant mitigating circumstance which ought to be considered in determination of sentence. In the interests of justice we request you to give due importance to this. The government to that extent is not bound by the conclusions arrived at by the Supreme Court (See Shanker v. State of U.P. (1975) 3 SCC 851; Vivian Rodrick v. The State of West Bengal (1971) 1 SCC 468);Kehar Singh v. Union of India(1989) 1 SCC 204para 10.
    2. Yakub Memon is Mentally Unfit for Execution

    Yakub Memon has been suffering from schizophrenia for the last 20 years which makes him unfit for execution. His mental condition has been certified by jail doctors. Schizophrenia as a mental illness has been held by the Supreme Court (Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India, (2014) 3 SCC 1 para 86-87) to render a convict unfit for execution. Your Excellency is required to consider the mental health of a convict before deciding his mercy petition, and can summon his medical records from the prison from the time of his arrest.
    3. Role in the 1993 Bomb Blasts Conspiracy

    Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim as the Main Conspirators
    As per the case of the prosecution, the 1993 bomb blasts were orchestrated by Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim to seek revenge for the demolition of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya(YakubMemon v. State of Maharashtra, (2013) 13 SCC 1 para 148, 1253). Both Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim have been absconding and Yakub, brother of Tiger Memon, who was not the main actor in the conspiracy is being executed.
    Commuted Co-accused played a larger role in the Conspiracy than Yakub Memon: Prejudiced on Account of being Tiger Memon's Brother
    The TADA Court convicted 100 persons and awarded death penalty to 11 persons. In appeal, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentences of all the convicts except Yakub Memon. In comparison to Yakub Memon, the 10 co-accused persons whose death sentences were commuted planted the bombs themselves and played a much more critical and direct role in the actual execution of the bomb blast conspiracy. Several of whom even travelled to Pakistan for arms training. This shows Yakub Abdul Razak Memon who is facing an imminent execution only on account of being Tiger Memon's younger brother.
    Witness in the case
    Unlike the main accused, Yakub Memon surrendered before the authorities, a fact which has been confirmed on July 24 by the then officer in charge of the entire operation, Shri B.Raman. Yakub Memon is the person who has provided information about Pakistan involvement. His execution will weaken the case against the involvement of the Pakistan agencies as there are no other witnesses available.
    4. Death Sentence of Convicts in other Terror Cases Commuted

    It is also worthwhile to note that death sentences imposed on the aides of Veerappan (convicted and sentenced to death under TADA), Rajiv Gandhi killers and Devender Pal Singh Bhullar have been commuted recently by the Supreme Court. While the mercy petitions of Verappan's aides, Rajiv Gandhi's three killers and Devender Pal Singh Bhullar were decided belatedly by the President, thereby giving them the claim of delay jurisprudence, the Home Ministry has moved swiftly to reject Yakub Abdul Razak Memon's mercy's petition. It seems that subjective factors are the basis of decisions which lead to arbitrary actions.
    5. Death Sentence awarded under TADA which was repealed for being Unfair and Discriminatory

    Yakub Memon has been tried and sentenced to death under TADA, a special law which was repealed by the Parliament on account of it having been used to target the minorities. The Supreme Court in Vijaykumar Baldev Mishra v. State of Maharashtra, (2007) 12 SCC 687para 30 also doubted the legality of prosecutions pursued after the repeal of TADA. Given the highly compromised rule of law credentials of TADA, executing Yakub Memon will perpetuate the dark legacy of this law.
    Final Plea
    We most humbly request your Excellency to consider the case of Yakub Abdul Razak Memon and spare him from the noose of the death for a crime that was master-minded by someone else to communally divide the country. Grant of mercy in this case will send out a message that while this country will not tolerate acts of terrorism, as a nation we are committed to equal application of the power of mercy and values of
    forgiveness, and justice. Blood letting and human sacrifice will not make this country a safer place; it will, however, degrade us all.
    Yours Sincerely,
    Justice Panachand Jain (Retd) Justice H.S. Bedi (Retd)
    Justice P. B. Sawant (Retd) Justice H. Suresh (Retd)
    Justice K. P. Siva Subramaniam (Retd) Justice S. N. Bhargava (Retd)
    Justice K Chandru (Retd) Justice Nagmohan Das (Retd)
    Shatrughan Sinha MP Mani Shankar Aiyer, MP
    Ram Jethmalani, MP Majeed Memon, MP
    Sitaram Yechury, MP, G.S, CPI(M) D. Raja, MP, Secretary, CPI
    K.T.S Tulsi, MP H.K. Dua, MP
    T. Siva, MP
    Prakash Karat, CPI(M), Member, Polit Bureau
    Dipankar Bhattacharya, General Secretary, CPI(ML)-Liberation
    Brinda Karat, CPI(M), Member, Polit Bureau
    N. Ram, Senior Journalist
    Prashant Bhushan, Senior Lawyer
    Jagmati Sangwan, General Secretary, AIDWA
    Kavita Krishnan, Secretary, AIPWA
    Annie Raja, General Secretary, NFIW
    Tushar Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi Foundation
    M. K. Raina, Film & theatre artist
    Anand Patwardhan, Filmmaker
    Naseeruddin Shah, Actor
    Mahesh Bhatt, Filmmaker
    Lalit Vachani, Filmmaker
    Ram Rahman
    Vivan Sundaram, Artist
    Prof. Prabhat Patnaik
    Prof. C. P. Chandrasekhar
    Prof. Utsa Patnaik
    Ritu Diwan, Former Director & Head Dept of Economics, Mumbai University
    Jean Dreze
    Pamela Philipose, Journalist
    Achin Vanaik
    Adv. Flavia Agnes, Director, Majlis Legal Centre, Mumbai.
    Parthiv Shah
    Prof. Irfan Habib
    Prof. Arjun Dev
    Prof. D. N. Jha
    Prof. Kalpana Kannibaran, Hyderabad
    Indira Jaisingh, Former, Addl. Sol. General
    Kirti Singh, Former Member, Law Commission
    Vrinda Grover, Lawyer
    Prof. Abhijit Sen
    Dr. Imrana Qadir
    Dilip D’souza, Author
    Ravi Chelam, Biologist and Conservationist Scientist, Bengaluru
    Prof. Sohini Ghosh
    Associate Prof. Sabina Gadihoke
    Smita Gupta, economist
    Prof. Jayati Ghosh
    Prof. Jagmohan Singh, Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Ludhiana
    Shabnam Hashmi, Anhad
    Manisha Sethi, Academic
    Prof. Ved Kumari
    Biraj Patnaik
    Virginia Saldanha
    Prof.Madhu Prashad
    Anees Azmi
    Rahul Saxena
    Anjali Mody
    Dr. Nikita Sood, Oxford University
    Rahul Roy, Filmmaker
    Dr. Ayesha Kidwai
    Prof. Harbans Mukhia
    Adv. Kamayani Bali Mahabal
    Binoo John (senior journalist, author)
    Nachiket Udupa
    N. Jayaram
    Prof. Pulin Nayak
    Prof. Kamal Mitra Chenoy
    Angana Chatterjee
    Deep Joshi
    Mr. Tarun Bhartiya, Shillong
    Ms. Angela Rangad, Shillong
    Sanjay Karkala
    Gitanjali Prasad
    Vivek Sundara
    Arundhati Dhuru NAPM
    Sandeep Pandey, Socialist Party
    Dr John Dayal, Member, National Integration Council
    Chetan Mali
    Vidula Ramabai
    Nandini Sundar, Professor, Delhi School of Economics, Delhi University
    Suroor Mander
    Rammanohar Reddy
    Kiran Bhatty, Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
    Laxmi Murthy
    Aruna Roy, MKSS
    Rev. Kyrsoibor Pyrtuh, Shillong
    Ms. Kalpana Kumar, Delhi
    Asad Zaidi, Writer
    Dunu Roy, Hazards Centre, New Delhi
    Sohail Akbar
    Mr. Napolean S. Mawphniang, Shillong
    Ms. Gertrude Lamare, , Shillong
    Ms. Janice Pariat, Shillong
    Ms. Angela Rangad, Shillong
    Mr. Tarun Bhartiya, Shillong
    Ms. Mona Mishra, Delhi
    Mr. Aflatoon, Varanasi, Secretary (Organisation), Samajwadi Janparishad
    Mr. Manas Das, Bangalore
    Ms. Amba Kak, Delhi
    Kshetrimayum Onil, Imphal
    Subrat Kumar Sahu, Delhi
    Dr. Kranti Bhavana, Patna
    Mr. Taru Dalmia, Delhi
    Mr. Apal, Jaunpur
    Mr. Mujibur Khan, Delhi
    Ms Kanika Kamra, Chandigarh
    Ms Neelima Goyal
    Ms Brinda Bose, Delhi
    Mr. Hossein Fazeli,
    Mr. Jatinder Mauhar Singh, Chandigarh
    Himanshi Rawat, Delhi
    Dhruba J. Dutta
    Abhinandita Mathur
    Rahul Saxena, Bangalore, India
    Muralidharan, Secretary, National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled
    Ghazala Jamil
    Sohail Hashmi
    Prabir Purkayastha
    Nikhil De, MKSS
    Michael Noronha, (Mysore)
    Ovais Sultan Khan
    Abha Baiya
    Ashok Chowdhury, AIUFWP
    Bondita Acharya, Jorhat, Assam
    Dr.Rosemary Dzuvichu, Nagaland University, Kohima
    Kalyani Menon-Sen
    Gita Sen
    Vani Subramaniam
    Saheli Women's Resource Centre
    Gabriele Dietrich
    Niraj Malik
    Javed Malick
    Kiran Shaheen
    Dyuti Ailawadi
    Ramlath Kavil
    Supriya Madangarli
    Amrita Shodhan
    Geetanjali Gangoli
    Helen Saldana
    Albertina Almeida
    Pushpa Achanta
    Kalpana Mehta
    WSS Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression
    Vineeta Bal
    Malini Subramaniam
    Sumi Krishna
    Ratna Appnender
    Sujata Patel
    Chayanika Shah
    Sadhna Arya
    Asmita Basu
    Johanna Lokhande
    Pyoli Swatija
    Mamta Singh
    Ardhendu Sen
    Sakina Bahora
    Juhi Jain
    Meena Seshu
    Vahida Nainar
    Indira Chakravarthy
    Anubha Rastogi
    Soma KP
    Abha Bhaiya
    Runu Chakraborty
    Shraddha Chickerur
    Mihira Sood
    Nisha Biswas
    Ilina Sen
    Preetha Nair
    Rakhi Sehgal
    Shoma Sen
    Greeshma Aruna Rai
    Uma Chandru
    Shals Mahajan
    LABIA Queer Feminist Collective
    Sujata Gothoskar
    Sandhya Gokhale
    Forum Against Oppression of Women
    Nikita Sonavane
    Lalita Ramdas
    Veena Shatrughna
    Abhi Nandita Mathur
    Freda Guttman
    Vinod Mubayi, Co-editor, Insaf Bulletin
    T K Raghunathan
    Abby Lippman, PhD, Professor Emerita, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Martin Duckworth, cineaste
    Shrikumar Poddar NRISAHI
    George Abraham NRISAHI
    Mohammad Imran NRISAHI
    Kasim Sait Progressive Interactions, Chennai
    Kareem Sait
    Jai Sen
    Prof.Praveen Jha
    A K Ramakrishnan
    Gitanjali Prasad
    Rohan Dominic Mathews
    Amod Shah
    Shreya Agarwal
    Anamika Lahiri
    Rhea John
    Kiran Bhatty
    Vanita Leah Falcao
    Ankita Aggarwal
    Aashish Gupta
    Avantika Dhingra
    Radhika Jha
    Seema Jha
    Sridhar A
    Farah Naqvi, Writer and Activist, Delhi
    Radha Holla Brar
    Vinay Kulkarni
    Veena Shatrugna
    R Srivatsan KS Jacob
    Ravi Duggal
    Indira Charkavarti
    Sulakshna Nandi
    Amar Jesani
    Dhruv Mankad
    Manisha Gupte
    Renu Khanna
    Saraswathy Ganapathy
    Anant Phadke
    Chinu Srinivasan
    Ygesh Jain
    Dr. Mohan Rao
    C Sathyamala
    Pallavi Gupta
    Sukla Sen
    Veena Johari
    Ajaya Kumar Singh, Social Activist, Odisha Forum for Social Action, Bhubaneswar
    Amalendu Upadhyaya, Editor, hastakshep.com
    Anjali Monteiro, Mumjbai
    Anubha Rastogi, advocate, Mumbai
    Anuradha Bhasin Jamwal, Jamwal
    Apoorvanand, Teacher, DU
    Capt. Tauseef H. Mukadam, Airline Pilot - Air Asia India, Bangalore
    Darryl D'Monte, Chairperson, Forum of Environmental Journalists of India (FEJI), Mumbai
    Devangshu Datta, New Delhi
    Farah Naqvi, Writer and Activist, Delhi
    Fr. Cedric Prakash sj, Director, PRASHANT, Gujarat
    Francis Parmar.Gujarat
    G. M. Sheikh, artist, Vadodara
    Gagan Sethi, development professional, Gujarat
    Geeta Seshu, Journalist, Mumbai, Maharashtra
    Ghanshyam Shah, academician, Gujarat
    Githa Hariharan, writer, New Delhi
    Harsh Kapoor, New Delhi
    Harsh Mander, social activist, writer, Aman Biradari, New Delhi
    Hussain Indorewala, Asst. Professor, Madhta Pradesh
    Indira Chandrasekhar, publisher, New Delhi
    K.P. Jayasankar, Mumbai
    Manan Trivedi, Social Activist, Gujarat
    Manoranjan Mohanty, New Delhi
    Mitul Baruah, Syracuse University, NY
    Mukul Mangalik, Ramjas College, DU
    N.D.Jayaprakash, Social Activist, New Delhi
    Nasreen Fazalbhoy, Mumbai
    Navaid Hamid, MOEMIN, New Delhi
    Nilanjana S Roy, New Delhi
    Nilima Sheikh, artist, Vadodara
    Priya Pillai , Environmental Activist , Greenpeace India.
    Radha Khan, Freelance development consultant.
    Ram Puniyani, writer, Mumbai
    Rohit Chopra, Associate Professor Santa Clara University
    Rupa Gulab
    S.Q.Masood, activist, Hyderabad
    Sadanand Menon, Chennai
    Sanjiv Bhatt, IPS Gujarat
    Shankar Singh, MKSS, Rajasthan
    Sheba George, Director , SAHR WARU , Gujarat
    Vineet Tiwari, Progressive Writers Association, Indore
    Swarna Rajagopalan, Researcher, Chennai
    Isha Khandelwal, Lawyer, Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group
    Shalini Gera, Lawyer, Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group
    Nandini Rao, women's rights activist, New Delhi
    Y J Rajendra, GEneral Secretary, PUCL - Karnataka
    Irfan Engineer, Mumbai
    Prof Archana Prasad
    Dr. Dinesh Abrol

    Courtesy ; The Huffington Post

    Next Story