News Updates

Fraud committed against banks is offence against the society says SC

Live Law News Network
15 Oct 2013 9:01 AM GMT
Fraud committed against banks is offence against the society says SC
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?
Hearing a criminal appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation against the accused who obtained a loan on the basis of forged documents, the Apex Court said that fraud committed against banks is an offence against the society and asked the Courts not to provide any forbearance to such offenders.

A bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and S J Mukopadhayaya said that, “The offences when committed in relation with banking activities including offences under Sections 420 (cheating), 471 (using forged document) have harmful effect on the public and threaten the well-being of the society. These offences fall under the category of offences involving moral turpitude committed by public servants while working in that capacity.”

The Bench said, “Prima facie, one may state that the bank as the victim in such cases but, in fact, the society in general, including customers of the Bank is the sufferer.”

In the instant case it is alleged that the accused along with officers in Indian Overseas Bank acquired a loan of Rs. 1.5 crore on the basis of forged documents. Later a complaint was registered against the accused, a senior manager at the bank and others involved in the incident. The accused refunded the money while the trial was going on and moved the Calcutta High Court for quashing the proceedings against them. The criminal proceedings were quashed by the High Court and the CBI approached the Supreme Court against this order.

Setting aside the order of the High Court, the Bench concluded that, “We are of the opinion that the High Court erred in addressing the issue in right perspective.” The Court also directed the trial court to proceed with the matter in accordance with law and to conclude the trial expeditiously.
Next Story