News Updates

Hearing of ex- Supreme Court judge Defamation plea adjourned to May 22

Apoorva Mandhani
16 May 2014 2:56 AM GMT
Hearing of ex- Supreme Court judge Defamation plea adjourned to May 22
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Delhi High Court has said that the defamation suit filed by former Supreme Court judge Swatanter Kumar against a woman lawyer and some media houses will not be heard, until the plea for transfer of the case to Bangalore City Civil Court is decided by the Supreme Court.

The matter was adjourned to May 22 by Justice Manmohan Singh, reportedly directing the woman lawyer’s counsel to present before him, the petition filed in the apex court.

Livelaw had reported earlier this week that the woman lawyer has demanded transfer of case out of Delhi. She demanded the transfer to Bangalore’s City Civil Court because of retired judge’s status in the legal fraternity. She claimed that she was rendered a subordinate position in view of the institutional bias working in his favor.

She had pressed charges against him due to an incident that allegedly occurred when she was a law intern. The impending defamation suit is filed against the intern, along with The Indian Express and a senior reporter of the paper, Times Now and CNN-IBN.

The Delhi High Court was scheduled to hear an application by the lawyer to vacate the injunction orders passed by the Court in January. These orders pertained to directing the newspapers, TV channels and Websites to abstain from publishing any report highlighting the allegations of sexual harassment against the former judge, without specifying in the headline that these were mere allegations. This injunction also pertained to refraining all media organization from publishing photographs of the retired judge, “which may suggest connection of the plaintiff with the said allegations”.  Read the Live Law story here.

The lawyer has also filed a separate petition in the Supreme Court, demanding an inquiry into the alleged sexual harassment charges against Kumar, along with scrutinizing the viability of having a permanent mechanism to deal with similar charges against sitting and retired judges. The matter is likely to be heard by a three-judge bench in July.

Justice Kumar had demanded Rs five crore as damages from the law intern, who made the allegation against him, and three media groups that exposed her complaint out in the open.

Read the Story regarding the allegation of sexual harassment by a law intern against the former SC Judge here.

Next Story