Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: October 2023

Nominal Index [Citation 464 - 508]Wynk Ltd. v. Tips Industries Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 464Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 465Maharashtra Rajya Apang Karmachari Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 466Sunil s/o Fattesing Sable v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 467State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Anil Kacharu Shinde 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 468Knight Riders Sports Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 469Dinanath Manik Katkar v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 470Vaibhav Subhash Raut v. State of Maharashtra (ATS) 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 471Hatim Fidaali Rajkotwala and Anr. v. Land Acquisition Officer 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 472Dr. Kamal Chandra Tiwari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 473Ramkali Dayakisan Gupta & Anr v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 474Bachpan Bachao Andolan & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 475Dr. Mahendra Vilas Phalke And Ors vs State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 476Mohammed Atiq Ibrahim Ansari v. Central Board of Film Certification & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 477Lalit S/o Nandlal Bais v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 478ABC v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 479Ravindra Dattaram Waikar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 480ABC v. XYZ 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 481Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 482Sandip Sundarrao Patil and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 483Bhushan s/o. Sangappa Chaudhari v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 484Satyaseelan Kuttappan v. PP Sudhakaran and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 485Play Games 24X7 Pvt. Ltd. Vs Loran Leasing And Infotech Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 486Parvi Ashish Chakravarti v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 457Baramati Agro Ltd. v. Regional Officer, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 488Faaiz Anwar Qureshi v. Union of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 489Nilesh s/o Ajinath Udmale, v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 490Dr. Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 491Aarti w/o Santosh Pawar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 492Swiss Re Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 493Film Farm India Pvt Ltd v. ALT Digital Media Entertainment Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 494Dr. P. Varavara Rao v. National Investigation Agency and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 495Indumati Borse v. Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 496Sameer Baijanath Joshi v. Union of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 497Zakir Yusuf Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 498M/s. Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt Ltd v. Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 499Partha Sarathy Sarkar v Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 500Rakesh Kumar Wadhawan v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 501Appasaheb Pandurang Yadav (Deceased) Through his legal heir v. Appasaheb Virupaksh Tandale 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 502Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati v. Union of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 503Sanjay Nathmal Jain v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 504Sunil Shishupal Nayak v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 505Anandraj Manikam v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 506Nikhil Ashokrao Waghmare and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 507Manik Chandru Deokar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 508Reports/JudgmentsWynk v. TIPS | Internet Based Music Streaming Platforms Not Eligible For Compulsory Music Licences Available For TV, Radio: Bombay HCCase Title: Wynk Ltd. v. Tips Industries Ltd.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 464The Bombay High Court held that online music streaming and downloading platforms would not be eligible for discounted compulsory licenses to their music under Section 31D of the Copyrights Act.This means that internet-based platforms will have to negotiate contracts with big record companies to use their repertoire of music unlike radio and television networks. A division bench comprising Justices Gautam Patel and Gauri Godse upheld an order passed by Justice SJ Kathawalla, now retired, in a dispute between Bharati Airtel Ltd’s WYNK Ltd and Tips.Bombay High Court Paves Way For Reconstruction Of Dainik Bhaskar Director’s House Near INS Trata Without NOC From Naval AuthoritiesCase Title: Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 465The Bombay High Court directed BMC to process within four months the application for permission to reconstruct a three-storey house in Worli for Dainik Bhaskar director Girish Agarwal without requiring a No Objection Certificate from Naval authorities- due to the site’s proximity with naval missile battery base INS Trata.A division bench of Justice Sunil B Shukre and Justice...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: October 2023

Amisha Shrivastava

Tags