Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 07 To August 13, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 656 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 681NOMINAL INDEXBharatiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh vs Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 656 NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD v. M/S INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 657 VIVEK KUMAR & ORS. v. STATE & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 658 FOODLINK F AND B HOLDINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 659 Jaiprakash Associates Limited v. MSEFC 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 660 DISTRICT MAGISTRATE WEST DISTRICT THROUGH NEHA BANSAL v. JOSAN DIAGNOTICS CENTRE & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 661 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs GOLDMINES TELEFILMS PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 662 DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ANR. v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 663 SUN PARMA LABORATORIES LTD. v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 664 RAKESH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHII & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 665 SARTAJ @ALLAHARAKHA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 666 RAVI MANCHANDA TRADING AS SEEMA ENGINEERING WORKS v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 667 PCIT Versus M/S Eltek Sgs Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 668 ANURAG GOEL v. CHHAVI AGARWAL 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 669 NABAL THAKUR (IN J.C.) v. THE STATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 670 Landmark Property Development and Company Limited & ORS. vs Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 671 ISHWAR SINGH DAHIYA v. STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ORS and other connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 672 ARJUN KAMTI v. THE STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 673 Gannon Dunkerley and Co Ltd v. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt Ltd, OMP(COMM) 234 of 2023 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 674 GOOGLE LLC v. DRS LOGISTICS (P) LTD. & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 675 PARVIN JUNEJA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 676 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED v. NOVAKIND BIO SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 677 Mrs. Vinnu Goel v. Mr. Santosh Goes and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 678 NHAI v. M/S. T.K. TOLL PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 679 DR J THULASEEDHARA KURUP v. APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE OF THE CABINET THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 680 DEPTT.OF HEALTH, GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI v. KAMLA MEHNDIRATTA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 681Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Against Corporatisation Of Ordnance Factories, Says Interest Of Employees Already ProtectedCase Title: Bharatiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh vs Union of IndiaCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 656The Delhi High Court has dismissed the writ petition challenging the Central Government’s decision to convert the Ordnance Factories Board (OFB) from a government department into seven public sector companies.The bench comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula said the corporatisation of OFB was a policy decision of the Government of India taken in national interest keeping in view the defence requirements of the country, and therefore, no case of interference was made out.Arbitrator Cannot Add The Amount Of Pre-Reference Interest To The Principal Amount While Determining Pendente Lite Interest: Delhi High CourtCase Details: NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD v. M/S INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTIONCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 657The Delhi High Court has held that the arbitrator cannot add the amount of pre-reference interest to the principal amount while determining pendente lite interest as the same would amount to levying interest on a compounded basis. It held that the principal amount has to remain static throughout.The bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Dharmesh Sharma held that Section 31(7)(a) of the A&C Act provides only for two periods of interest payable under the Act i.e., from the cause of action till the date of the award and from the date of the award till the payment is made. Further, it held that the distinction between pre-reference and pendente lite interest has vanished and is inapplicable to arbitrations governed by the Act of 1996.Ensure Settlement Deeds Are Drafted With Due Application Of Mind, Don't Use Printed Proforma: Delhi High Court To Mediation Centres & Family CourtsTitle: VIVEK KUMAR & ORS. v. STATE & ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 658The Delhi High Court has taken serious objection against the drafting of settlement agreements in matrimonial cases by mediation centres on “printed proforma.”“This court while dealing with petitions of matrimonial quashing often comes across the settlement agreements being drafted by the Mediation Centres which are on a printed proforma. This court takes serious objection to it,” Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said.The court added that the settlements on printed proforma sometimes gives an impression that there is no application of mind and the settlement deed has been drafted mechanically.Delhi High Court Restrains WOW Momo From Using ‘WOW China Bistro’ Mark In Trademark Infringement Suit By ‘China Bistro’Title: FOODLINK F AND B HOLDINGS...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 07 To August 13, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags