Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: February 26 To March 03, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

3 March 2024 1:46 PM GMT

  • Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: February 26 To March 03, 2024

    Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 213 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 252NOMINAL INDEXSteel Authority Of India Ltd vs Uniper Global Commodities. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 213Premoday Khakha v. State and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 214SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRA v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 215MS. KANISHKA (THROUGH MRS. SANTOSH (MOTHER) v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY...

    Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 213 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 252

    NOMINAL INDEX

    Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Uniper Global Commodities. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 213

    Premoday Khakha v. State and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 214

    SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRA v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 215

    MS. KANISHKA (THROUGH MRS. SANTOSH (MOTHER) v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 216

    The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 Versus Relx Inc 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 217

    COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 218

    ALI MOHAMMED v. DG, CISF AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 219

    MRS TEJINDER PAL GUJRAL v. S MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA & ORS. and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 220

    Devender Kumar Kashyap vs Chander Muni. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 221

    X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 222

    DR NAMIT GUPTA v. DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 223

    Apshara Garments Pvt. Ltd Versus Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Service Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 224

    STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. TERIIMERIDOORIYAN.COM & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 225

    Umaxe Projects Private Limited vs Air Force Naval Housing Board 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 226

    Jan Seva Welfare Society (Reg.) v. Union of India and Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 227

    ASHA CHAND v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 228

    MOHD ARIF ANSARI v. STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 229

    DEEPAK SEHGAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 230

    VISHWAJEET SINGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 231

    UNION OF INDIA & ORS v. SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 232

    SETU VINIT GOENKA v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 233

    Smriti Irani v. Pawan Khera & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 234

    MS. YOGAMAYA M.G. v. SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 235

    J.P. SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 236

    ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 237

    MS. SUJATA KOHLI v. RAJIV KHOSLA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 238

    Aakash Educational Services Ltd Vs M/S Lotus Education & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 239

    CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER v. KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 240

    Indian Highways Management Company Ltd. vs Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 241

    RESHMA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 242

    X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 243

    The Executive Engineer & Ors Vs M/S Bholasingh Jaiprakash Construction Ltd & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 244

    Zillion Infraprojecs Pvt. Ltd Through Anant Saxena Vs Fab-Tach Works & Constructons Pvt. Ltd. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 245

    Govt. Of NCT of Delhi vs M/s R.S Sharma Contractors Pvt. Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 246

    COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 247

    X v. SQUINT NEON & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 248

    ANUP BHENGRA @CHOTU v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 249

    RATUL PURI v. BANK OF BARODA and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 250

    Jagdish Bansal Versus Union Of India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 251

    M/s NHPC Ltd v. M/s Jaiprakash Associates Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 252

    Court Cannot Determine Admissibility, Relevancy, Materiality, And Weight Of Any Evidence Under Section 27 of A&C: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Uniper Global Commodities.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 213

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Sachin Datta held that the court under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot determine the admissibility, relevancy, materiality, and weight of any evidence, as doing so would amount to impermissible interference with the Tribunal's proceedings.

    Minor's Rape Case: High Court Denies Default Bail To Delhi Govt's Suspended Women & Child Department Officer, Wife

    Title: Premoday Khakha v. State and other connected matter

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 214

    The Delhi High Court on Monday denied default bail to Delhi Government's suspended Women and Child Development Department officer Premoday Khakha, accused of raping a minor girl over several months and impregnating her. Court also denied relief to Khakha's wife.

    'No Different From You Or Me': Delhi High Court Calls For Using Term 'Differently Abled' For Persons With Disabilities

    Title: SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRA v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 215

    Observing that those who suffer from disabilities as recognized by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, are no different from anyone, the Delhi High Court has said that the more appropriate term to use for such persons would be “differently abled” rather than “disabled”.

    “The RPWD Act, and all laws which strive to provide support to a person suffering from a disability, merely seek to neutralize the disability, so that the person's ability matches those of the rest of his peers, and they stand on an equal footing. This is the heart of the theory of equal opportunity, which pervades Article 14 and, indeed, the Constitution as a whole,” Justice C Hari Shankar said.

    CBSE Has No Right To Stop Student From Entering Exam Hall After Issuing Admit Card, Expected To Be Vigilant: Delhi High Court

    Title: MS. KANISHKA (THROUGH MRS. SANTOSH (MOTHER) v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 216

    The Delhi High Court observed that the Central Board of Secondary Examination (CBSE) is expected to be vigilant regarding the entitlement of the students to appear in the examination.

    Justice C Hari Shankar said that the CBSE has no right to stop a student from entering the examination hall, after issuing admit card.

    Subscription To Legal Database Can't Be Construed Transfer Of Copyright, Subscription Fee Is Not Royalty: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 Versus Relx Inc

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 217

    The Delhi High Court has held that subscription to legal databases cannot be construed as a transfer of copyright.

    The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav has observed that the subscription fees of the legal database LexisNex piad by an Indian subscriber neither comprise a transfer of copyright nor do they include a transfer of a right to apply technology and other related aspects, which are spoken of in Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA.

    Fill Vacancies In Child Welfare Committees & Juvenile Justice Boards By April 15: High Court To Delhi Govt

    Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 218

    The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to complete the formalities of the selection process for filling vacancies in all the Child Welfare Committees (CWCs) and Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs) in the national capital by April 15.

    CISF Personnel Can Be Deployed Anywhere In India Or Abroad As Per Requirements; Operational Exigencies Can't Be Sidelined: Delhi High Court

    Title: ALI MOHAMMED v. DG, CISF AND ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 219

    The Delhi High Court has said that Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel can be deployed anywhere in India or abroad as per operational requirements and the administrative or operational exigencies can never be sidelined or disregarded.

    'Charity Begins At Home': Delhi HC Holds Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee's Top Officials In Contempt Over Non-Payment Of Teachers' Salaries

    Title: MRS TEJINDER PAL GUJRAL v. S MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA & ORS. and other connected matters

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 220

    The Delhi High Court has found the President and General Secretary of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee guilty of intentionally not complying with a 2021 ruling that ordered payment of arrears of salaries to teachers and staff of Guru Harkrishan Public School (GHPS), in view of fixation of their pay under the 6th and 7th Pay Commission.

    Party Providing Wrong Address During Proceedings Cannot Argue Incorrect Arbitration Notice U/s 21 A&C: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Devender Kumar Kashyap vs Chander Muni.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 221

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Rekha Palli held that when a party provides its incorrect address in proceedings cannot be permitted to urge that the invocation notice of arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not served at the correct address.

    Concealing Income To Avoid Paying Maintenance Or Claim Exorbitant Amount In Matrimonial Cases Is Unfortunate: Delhi High Court

    Title: X v. Y

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 222

    The Delhi High Court has said that it is unfortunate that in matrimonial litigations, the parties do not come out with their true income.

    “Effort is always made to conceal the true income by the husband in order to avoid payment of maintenance to the wife and the child. On the other hand, effort is made by the wife to claim exorbitant amount as the income of the husband,”Justice Navin Chawla said.

    High Court Rejects Plea Challenging Mandatory Registration Of Allopathy Practitioners With Delhi Medical Council

    Title: DR NAMIT GUPTA v. DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ANR

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 223

    The Delhi High Court has dismissed a PIL challenging a notice issued by the Delhi Medical Council (DMC) directing any person practicing allopathy, the modern scientific system of medicine, in the national capital to be mandatorily registered with it, as per the Delhi Medical Council Act, 1997.

    Delhi High Court Quashes SCN & Order Lacking Reasons For Retrospective Cancellation Of GST Registration

    Case Title: Apshara Garments Pvt. Ltd Versus Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Service Tax

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 224

    The Delhi High Court has quashed the show cause notice, which was lacking reasons for retrospective cancellation of GST registration.

    Delhi High Court Grants Dynamic Injunction Restraining Rogue Websites From Illegally Streaming 'Copyrighted Content' Of STAR Channels, Hotstar

    Title: STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. TERIIMERIDOORIYAN.COM & ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 225

    The Delhi High Court has granted a dynamic injunction in favour of Star India as it restrained 21 rogue websites from illegally streaming its content, including TV shows and movies broadcasted on STAR channels and OTT platform Disney+ Hotstar.

    Application Under Section 29(A) A&C Act Doesn't Constitute Express Waiver In Writing U/s 12(5) To Challenge Arbitrator's Ineligibility: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Umaxe Projects Private Limited vs Air Force Naval Housing Board

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 226

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri held that filing of the Section 29(A) application by a party did not amount to a waiver of its right to challenge the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The bench held that filing an application under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act for an extension of the mandate did not amount to an express waiver in writing under Section 12(5).

    Delhi High Court Orders Third-Party Audit Of MCD, DDA Public Toilets

    Title: Jan Seva Welfare Society (Reg.) v. Union of India and Ors.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 227

    The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), and North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) to get an audit done from a Union Government empanelled third-party auditor.

    A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Jan Sewa Welfare Society to ensure the availability of hygienic public urinals with clean water and electricity supply in the city.

    “Purely A Govt Function": Delhi High Court Refuses To Order Opening Of 24 Hours PAN India Doordarshan Channel For Sindhi Community

    Title: ASHA CHAND v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 228

    The Delhi High Court has refused to direct the Union Government and Doordarshan to open a new 24 hours PAN India Doordarshan channel for the Sindhi Community, observing that it is purely a governmental function.

    S.8 UAPA | Intent Of Notifying Place 'Used For Unlawful Association' Is Not To Seize Properties Of Innocent Owners: Delhi High Court

    Title: MOHD ARIF ANSARI v. STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 229

    The Delhi High Court has recently observed that the intent of notifying a place under Section 8 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, is to ensure that it is not used for unlawful activities and is not to seize properties of innocent owners who are neither members of the unlawful association nor involved in unlawful activities.

    Take Steps To Fill Vacancies In Municipal Taxation Tribunal: High Court To Delhi Govt

    Title: DEEPAK SEHGAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 230

    The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to fill up the vacancies in the Municipal Taxation Tribunal and ensure that it is in place.

    “It is hoped and expected that expeditious steps shall be taken in this regard,” Justice Sachin Datta said in an order passed on February 14.

    Section 37 Of NDPS Act Doesn't Fetter Grant Of Bail On Ground Of Undue Delay In Completion Of Trial: Delhi High Court

    Title: VISHWAJEET SINGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) and other connected matter

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 231

    The Delhi High Court ruled that Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, does not fetter grant of bail to an accused on the ground of undue delay in the completion of trial.

    Cordelia Cruise Case: Delhi High Court Modifies CAT Order, Sets Aside Direction To Pass Speaking Order Before Initiating Action Against Sameer Wankhede

    Title: UNION OF INDIA & ORS v. SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE & ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 232

    Modifying an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in August last year, the Delhi High Court has set aside the direction of passing a reasoned and speaking order before any action is initiated against Sameer Wankhede on the basis of an enquiry report in relation to the Cordelia cruise drugs case, after granting a personal hearing to him.

    Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Normalization Procedure Based On Percentile Score Adopted For JEE Mains

    Title: SETU VINIT GOENKA v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 233

    The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea challenging the normalization procedure based on percentile score adopted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) for JEE (Mains) examination for entrance into the various Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs).

    Smriti Irani v Congress Leaders: Delhi High Court Modifies Injunction Order On Taking Down Of Content By Social Media Intermediaries

    Case Title: Smriti Irani v. Pawan Khera & Ors.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 234

    The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction order passed in 2022 in favour of Union Minister Smriti Irani in her defamation case against three Congress leaders, on the aspect of taking down of content by social media intermediaries.

    SCBA Meeting On Nomination Of Women Advocates As Executive Members Will Be Conducted Within Two Months: Delhi High Court Told

    Title: MS. YOGAMAYA M.G. v. SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 235

    The Delhi High Court was told that the General Body Meeting of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to discuss the aspect of nomination of women advocates as its Executive Members will be conducted within two months.

    'Can't Reorganize State Boundaries': Delhi High Court Rejects PIL To Merge North Indian Cities, Shift Punjab's High Court

    Title: J.P. SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 236

    The Delhi High Court rejected a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking merger of various cities in North India with the national capital, and shifting Punjab's High Court to Jalandhar instead of Chandigarh.

    Delhi High Court Rejects ArcelorMittal's Plea Seeking Approval To Commence Mining Operations In Jharkhand's Saranda Forest Division

    Title: ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 237

    The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea moved by ArcelorMittal seeking approval and clearance to commence mining operations in Jharkhand's Saranda Forest Division.

    Delhi High Court Discharges Former DHCBA President Rajiv Khosla In Criminal Contempt Case By Former Judge

    Title: MS. SUJATA KOHLI v. RAJIV KHOSLA

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 238

    The Delhi High Court has discharged Rajiv Khosla, lawyer and former High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, in the contempt case filed by retired judicial officer Sujata Kohli.

    A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain observed that Kohli was not able to produce any material which may compel the court to form an opinion that Khosla committed any criminal contempt.

    Even If Arbitral Award Set Aside For Non-Compliance With Section 12, Parties Can File Fresh Section 11 Application For Arbitrator Appointment: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Aakash Educational Services Ltd Vs M/S Lotus Education & Ors.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 239

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma held that mere invalidation or unenforceability of the arbitrator appointment process does not render the entire arbitration clause void. The bench held that even if an arbitration award is set aside due to unilateral appointment and non-compliance with Section 12 of the Arbitration Act, fundamental agreement between the parties to submit their disputes to arbitration remains intact. Therefore, the parties can file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act for arbitrator appointment.

    Delhi High Court Sets Aside CIC Order Asking CBDT To Provide Information On Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust

    Title: CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER v. KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 240

    The Delhi High Court has set aside an order passed by the Chief Information Commission (CIC) directing the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to provide information relating to Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, set up by the Union Government to construct and manage the Ram temple in Ayodhya, under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

    MSME Facilitation Council Can't Arbitrate Matters Pertaining To Individual Service Providers Outside The Scope Of MSME Act: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Indian Highways Management Company Ltd. vs Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 241

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Prateek Jalan held that the MSME Facilitation Council does not have the jurisdiction to arbitrate matters pertaining to individual service providers who do not fall under the definition of 'supplier' under the MSME Act. The same would be violative of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    Policing Not Meant To Serve Interests Of Any Specific Religious Community: High Court On 'Pardanashin' Muslim Woman's Plea Against Delhi Police

    Title: RESHMA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 242

    The Delhi High Court has observed that policing is not tailored to serve the interests of any specific religious or any cultural community alone and has to be guided by the principles of impartiality, fairness, and reasonability.

    “While respecting cultural sensitivities and religious practices, law enforcement agencies must prioritise the common good and uphold the law without discrimination,” Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma observed.

    Wife Turning Children Against Father Is Parental Alienation, Amounts To Grave Mental Cruelty: Delhi High Court

    Title: X v. Y

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 243

    The Delhi High Court has observed that the act of a wife in trying to turn the children against the father is a clear case of “parental alienation”, which amounts to “grave mental cruelty.”

    Observing that a person may be a bad husband but that does not lead to the necessary conclusion of he being a bad father, a division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said:

    “Howsoever abysmal the differences maybe between the spouses, but in no realm can the act of the aggrieved spouse of igniting animosity and hostility in the minor child in an attempt to use the child as a weapon to get even with their spouse, could be justifiable.”

    Party Fails To Challenge Arbitral Award U/s 34 A&C Cannot Approach High Court Under Article 226: Delhi High Court Dismisses Writ Petition

    Case Title: The Executive Engineer & Ors Vs M/S Bholasingh Jaiprakash Construction Ltd & Anr.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 244

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad held that Article 226 of the Constitution of India is an extraordinary remedy and cannot be invoked where a party has failed to invoke other remedies available to it under law. It held that if a party fails to challenge the arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot approach the High Court by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

    Section 29A Not Applicable To Arbitration Proceedings Commenced Before 2015: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Zillion Infraprojecs Pvt. Ltd Through Anant Saxena Vs Fab-Tach Works & Constructons Pvt. Ltd.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 245

    The Delhi High Court single bench Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri held that Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which prescribes a time limit for issuance of arbitral award is not applicable to arbitration proceedings commenced before 2015 Amendment Act. It held that arbitral proceedings commence on the date when the Respondent receives the request for reference to arbitration. Section 29A mandates for the tribunal to make the award within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings.

    Arbitrator Need Not To Be Technical In Nature, Within Power To Decide Matter On Basis Of Material On Record: Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition

    Case Title: Govt. Of NCT of Delhi vs M/s R.S Sharma Contractors Pvt. Ltd

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 246

    The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma held that arbitral proceedings before the arbitrator are not required to be technical in nature and the arbitrator is within its power to decide the same on the basis of material on record. The bench held that the arbitrator is the sole judge of the quality and quantity of evidence, and the court's role is not to reassess the material or correct the arbitrator's errors under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    Take Steps To Implement Suggestions For Improving Functioning Of Children Homes Within Four Weeks: High Court To Delhi Govt

    Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 247

    The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to take steps to implement within four weeks the suggestions for improving the facilities and functioning of the children homes in the national capital.

    A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain was referring to the suggestions made by Amicus Curiae, Senior Advocate Satish Tamta, in a suo motu case initiated by it in 2018.

    Doxing Can Result In Privacy Violation If Unchecked, Individuals Can't Be Rendered Remediless: Delhi HC On Woman's Plea Who Tweeted About Politician

    Title: X v. SQUINT NEON & ORS.

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 248

    While dealing with a woman's suit who posted a tweet on X (formerly Twitter) about an interview of a political figure and was later doxed by various individuals and entities, the Delhi High Court has observed that doxing, if permitted to go on unchecked, could result in violation of right to privacy.

    Justice Prathiba M Singh said that aggrieved parties or individuals in cases of doxing cannot be rendered remedyless, because the individual would have suffered an injury as the privacy of the individual is breached.

    Delay In Minor's Testimony Due To Psychological Distress Caused By Sexual Assault, Human Trafficking Not Ground For Bail To Accused: Delhi High Court

    Title: ANUP BHENGRA @CHOTU v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 249

    The Delhi High Court has observed that the delay in testimony of a minor, who is a victim of sexual assault and human trafficking, before the trial court, cannot serve as a ground for bail to the accused.

    Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma took note of the “realities of profound impact” of sexual assault and human trafficking on a minor victim, which extends beyond mere physical harm that inflicts enduring mental trauma.

    Delhi High Court Sets Aside Banks' Decision To Declare Ratul Puri As Wilful Defaulter Under RBI Master Circular

    Title: RATUL PURI v. BANK OF BARODA and other connected matters

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 250

    The Delhi High Court has quashed the decision of Bank of Baroda and Punjab National Bank declaring businessman Ratul Puri as a “wilful defaulter” under the Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters, 2015, issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

    Puri is the Chairman of Hindustan Power Projects Private Limited. The banks declared him as a wilful defaulter with respect to his association in another company, Moser Baer Solar Limited, as a result of which he was deprived from availing credit facilities for his prospective business enterprises.

    'Cash' Excluded From Definition Of 'Goods', Can't Be Seized: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Jagdish Bansal Versus Union Of India

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 251

    The Delhi High Court has directed the respondent department to forfeit or remit the cash seized from the premises of the petitioner to the petitioner along with interest.

    Counterclaims Can Be Enforced Under Section 36 Of The A&C Act If The Part Of Award Favouring Judgment-Debtor Is Set Aside: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: M/s NHPC Ltd v. M/s Jaiprakash Associates Ltd

    Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 252

    The High Court of Delhi has held that the counterclaims allowed by the arbitral tribunal can be enforced under Section 36 of the A&C Act when the portion of the award granting larger sums to the judgment-debtor (claimant in the arbitration) is set aside.

    Next Story