Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 29 To February 04, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 109 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 134NOMINAL INDEXAJAY KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 109ANAJALI PANDEY v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 110RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 111ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 112Sharjeel Imam v. State 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 113R K KAPOOR, ADVOCATE v. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 114ZORA TRADERS LIMITED & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 115KAMAL KANT AND COMPANY LLP v. RAASHEE FRAGRANCES INDIA PVT LTD 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 116Mohammad Hamim & Anr. v. Facebook India Online Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 117KASHMIR HARVARD EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 118 X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 119DHARAM NARAYAN GAUTAM v. STATE THROUGH ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 120SIYA OMAR THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PRIYANKA GUPTA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 121AMIT KUMAR & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 122MR MAHENDER KUMAR KHANDELWAL v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 123Yasin Malik v. Union of India & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 124CITIZENS WHISTLE BLOWER FORUM v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 125BAL KISHAN GUPTA v. DDA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 126CPIO CBI v. Sanjiv Chaturvedi 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 127X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 128MICHAL BENSON NWAOGU @ CHUNA BENSON v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 129A v. B 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 130RAVI KUMAR v. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 131X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 132Naman Gupta Versus Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 133Shri Balaji Enterprises & Ors vs Reserve Bank Of India & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 134News Reports Don't Impair Court's Ability To Determine True Facts: Delhi High Court Imposes Cost On Plea Seeking Gag Order Against NewspapersTitle: AJAY KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 109The Delhi High Court has imposed Rs. 10,000 costs on a man who sought gag order against Hindustan Times and Dainik Jagran, claiming that the newspaper reports which mentioned his name will have an adverse effect on the cases filed by him in different forums.Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed the plea moved by one Ajay Kumar seeking direction on the two newspapers to conceal his identity while circulating any news or article on him.Carrying Forward Of Unfilled EWS/DG Vacancies To Next Class In Subsequent Year Does Not Violate RTE Act: Delhi High CourtTitle: ANAJALI PANDEY v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 110The Delhi High Court has ruled that carrying forward of unfilled EWS or DG vacancies by a school to next class in subsequent year does not infracts or violate the Right to Education Act or any other legal provision.“Admitting of EWS/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry level class is the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section 2(n)(iv) of the RTE Act. If a School defaults, there is nothing illegal in directing it to make up the deficit in the next higher class in the next year,” Justice C Hari Shankar said.'Beneficial Legislation, Promotes Consumer Welfare': Delhi High Court Upholds Anti-Profiteering Provisions Under CGST Act And RulesTitle: RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 111The Delhi High Court has upheld the provisions concerning anti-profiteering measure and establishment of National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under the Central Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 and its Rules, observing that they are in the nature of a beneficial legislation as they promote consumer welfare.A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma upheld the constitutional validity of Section 171 of the Central Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rules 122, 124, 126, 127, 129, 133 and 134 of Rules of 2017.Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL To Include Ayurveda, Yoga In Ayushman Bharat PMJAY SchemeTitle: ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERSCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 112The Delhi High Court has dismissed public interest litigation seeking inclusion of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy in Union Government's public health insurance scheme Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY).A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora rejected the plea filed by BJP leader and Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in default due to non-prosecution.Sedition Case: Delhi High Court Directs Trial Court To Decide Sharjeel Imam's Plea Seeking Statutory Bail By February 17Title: Sharjeel Imam v. StateCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 113The Delhi High Court has...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 29 To February 04, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags