Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: August 2023

Nominal Index [Citations 199 - 237]:Ghulam Rasool Sofi Vs State Of J&k 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 199Mohammad Younis Mir Vs Union Territory of J&K & Anr 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 200Ravinder Kumar Vs State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 201Shahbaz Ahmad Palla 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 202Yoginder Singh Vs Union Of India 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 203Imran Nabi Wani Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 204State Of J&K Vs Shailender Singh 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 205Bijay Oraon Vs Union Of India 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 206Zahoor Ahmad Wani Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 207Abdul Rashid Bhat Vs Finanacial Commissioner 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 208Shahnawaz Ahmad Vs Union Of India 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 209Mudasir Nazir Vs University Of kashmir 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 210State Of J&K vs Narayan Dutt 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 211Abdul Hameed Ganie @ Dr.Hameed Fayaz vs. State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 212Sarwa Begum and Ors. (LRs of Late Shabir Ahmad Dar) Vs State of J&K and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 213Jammu and Kashmir National Conference through its General Secretary Ali Mohammad Sagar Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 214MANAGING DIRECTOR JK HANDICRAFTS Vs AGA SYED MUSTAFA & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 215Aamir Javid Waza and ors. Vs Gousia Jan and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 216MOHAMMAD ASHRAF RESHI Vs STATE OF J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 217Abdul Rashid Dar and others Vs Ghulam Qadir Dar and others 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 218Inder Jeet Singh Vs ICICI Lombard and another 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 219Vishwakarma Gun Works Vs Industrial Tribunal Court and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 220BR (name redacted) Vs State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 221Vinod Kumar and Others v. State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 222IRSHAD AHMAD QURESHI & ANR Vs. STATE OF J&K & OTHERS 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 223Gul Mohammad and Ors Vs State of J&K and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 224Noor Illahi Fakhtoo vs UT of J&K and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 225Surjeet Singh Vs Sheikh Behzad Khalid & others 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 226Nazir Ahmad Ganie and Another Vs Mohammad Amin Ganie 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 227Haseena Akhter Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Anr 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 228Mian Khan and Others Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 229Mohammad Amin Wani vs. UT Of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 230Gupta Modern Breweries Vs State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 231Tawqeer Bashir Magray Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Anr 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 232M/S CADILA HEALTH CARE LTD. Vs PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 233SSP Kathua Vs Baghwan Das 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 234BOCA Jammu Vs Nageen Ara 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 235State of J&K and others Vs Smt. Manjeet Kour and others 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 236Vinkal Sharma and others V/s UT of J&K and others 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 237Judgments/Orders: J&K High Court Refuses To Implement Human Rights Commission's Recommendation To Compensate Father Of Youth Killed By Security AgenciesCase Title: Ghulam Rasool Sofi Vs State Of J&kCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 199The Jammu and Kashmir & Ladakh High Court refused to implement the recommendation made by State Human Rights Commission to compensate the father of a youth killed by Indian Securities Agencies.Those Responsible For National Security Sole Judges Of What Preventive Actions Are Necessary: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Detention OrderCase Title: Mohammad Younis Mir Vs Union Territory of J&K & Anr.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 200The Jammu and Kashmir High Court emphasised on its limited scope to look into the manner in which the subjective satisfaction is arrived at by the detaining authority to order preventive detention of a person.“The courts do not even go into the questions as to whether the facts mentioned in the grounds of detention are correct or false. The reason for the rule is that to decide this, evidence may have to be taken by the courts and that it is not the policy of the law of preventive detention. This matter lies within the competence of the advisory board. Those who are responsible for national security or for maintenance of public order must be the sole judges of what the national security, public order or security of the State requires”, Justice M A Chowdhary observed.Jammu & Kashmir High Court Quashes Order Repatriating Employee To Parent Department After 21 YrsCase Title: Ravinder Kumar Vs State of J&KCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 201Shedding light on the law related to the timeframe for repatriating an employee to his parent department after his deputation, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court ruled that an employee, who has been permanently absorbed into a borrowing department/organization and whose lien has been terminated in their parent organization cannot be repatriated to their parent organization.“Once the petitioner who has been sent on deputation is absorbed in the borrowing department/organization and his lien in the parent department stood terminated, his repatriation, subsequently, after 21 years by virtue of order impugned is dehors the service rules and is illegal”, observed Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal."Fundamentalist Muslim Cannot Be Equated With An Extremist Or A Separatist": Jammu & Kashmir ...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: August 2023

Basit Amin Makhdoomi

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: August 2023

Basit Amin Makhdoomi

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers