Punjab & Haryana High Court Allows BAAS Educational Trust To Run School On Gram Panchayat Land, Says Dissemination Of Education Is Duty Of Panchayats

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the orders directing removal of a school building constructed by BAAS Educational Trust on the Gram Panchayat land in Haryana's Gurgaon districtThe division bench of Justice Suresh Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwary said the Gram Panchayat concerned has ensured that it makes a complete and efficient management of the school. The court also said that the construction of the school "is not outside the meaningful user" of the Panchayat land under Rule 3 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964.“Since the Panchayat land(s) is but evidently being used for the said specific purpose, thus the user of the Panchayat land(s) for the construction of a school thereon, by the petitioner-education trust, is well merited, as it does not infringe any of the relevant provisions of Rule 3 of the Rules of 1964, which contrarily permits user of the Panchayat land(s) for the construction of a school building, as has been done thereon, at the instance of the petitioner-educational trust,” said the court.BackgroundA group of retired Army officials and foreign nationals formed a trust, called BAAS Educational Trust, with the objective of providing education. Together with the Gram Panchayat of Gairatpur Baas, they established a school for children in nearby areas. On 13.06.2009, the Sarpanch of Village Gairatpur Baas proposed that the village's Khasra No. 110 (5 killa) be allocated for the school, and the petitioner-Trust be appointed to manage it, with the condition that the ownership of the building constructed by the Trust shall remain with the Gram Panchayat. Again on 25.3.2013, a second resolution was passed which was duly recorded in the Panchayat proceeding book, but, with some amendments in the terms and conditions qua construction and running of the school.Thereafter, the resolution was forwarded to the office of Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO), Sohna, District Gurgaon, who further sent it, with certain recommendations, to the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon on 14.3.2013.The recommendations made by BDPO were then forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner to the Director General Panchayat, Haryana, Chandigarh. Eventually, the matter was presented to the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Development and Panchayat, Haryana, who strongly opposed the transfer of shamlat land of Panchayat to a private or commercial entity, and directed the Deputy Commissioner to clarify the approval status of the school building construction by the petitioner on Gram Panchayat land. He further ordered the removal of the alleged illegal construction by the petitioner-Trust within 15 days.The Deputy Commissioner, with the guidance of BDPO, followed the directions passed by the Additional Chief Secretary and directed the removal of the building constructed by the petitioner-Trust on the Gram Panchayat land.The petitioner-Trust, dissatisfied with the orders of Additional Chief Secretary and subsequent orders, thus, approached the High Court for the quashing of these orders, and, sought that a mandamus be made upon the respondents for granting approval for the running of the school to it, especially keeping in view the resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat on 13.6.2009.JudgementUpon examining the resolution, the bench observed that within the domain of Section 21(XIII)(2) of the Act of 1994, the Gram Panchayat concerned has ensured that, thereupon, it makes a complete, and, efficient management of the petitioner-school. "Resultantly, also in the making of the resolution (supra), there is no departure from the statutory duties (supra), as become cast upon the Gram Panchayat concerned. As a sequel, it would not be in the interest of the students, who have been admitted in the petitioner-school, and, who are being imparted qualitative education, that an order for demolition, as challenged before this Court, is being enforced, as thereupon, prejudice would be caused to the academic pursuits of the school-going children in the petitioner-school, especially when they are being imparted qualitative education therein."The bench held that if the Gram Panchayat has allowed the construction of a school on the disputed land, which falls under the category of 'Gair Mumkin Johar' or 'Gair Mumkin Pond,' and the petitioner's school is already established there, then the Supreme Court's decision in Jagpal Singh and others vs State of Punjab and others provides leeway for the government to regularize an existing public utility, such as a school or a dispensary, on such land. "Resultantly, the above made exception against the user of ‘Gair Mumkin Johar’ land, or, ‘Gair Mumkin Pond’ land, for purpose(s), other than the earmarked purpose(s) thereof, does work in favour of the petitioner, as it has raised the school, which is providing the best qualitative education to the students concerned," said the court, adding such a change of land user falls within the exceptionsThe bench also said...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Allows BAAS Educational Trust To Run School On Gram Panchayat Land, Says Dissemination Of Education Is Duty Of Panchayats

Bhavya Singh

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Punjab & Haryana High Court Allows BAAS Educational Trust To Run School On Gram Panchayat Land, Says Dissemination Of Education Is Duty Of Panchayats

Bhavya Singh

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers