Top Stories

Human Rights Commissions are the hub of post-retirement posts for retired Judges; SC

Shobhit Batta
6 Aug 2014 5:56 AM GMT
Human Rights Commissions are the hub of post-retirement posts for retired Judges; SC
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Withering on Human Rights Commissions ,the Supreme Court  today observed that the Human Rights panel in Centre or States  are  merely becoming  the hub of post-retirement posts for retired judges. According to the court, these panels neither have penal enforcement power nor theyare able to protect rights of the people.

This statement came after Abhishek Manu Singhvi,  senior advocate and Amicus Curiae, in a PIL involving inspection on increasing custodial death cases, submitted a report stating that 15, 232 custodial deaths  were reported in India since 2007  which demand the active intervention of human right commissions  and suggested that the human rights panels should be given more powers.

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice T.S. Thakur observed  “by holding a post in human right commission, the retired judges gets a home, an office and a car but when it comes to services of human rights, what do they have? Many states do not even have a commission, and where there are commissions, they do not have staff, prosecutors & stenographers.”

The Court asked  “overall what purpose do they serve”?,  to which Singhvi replied that such commissions are ineffective as they lack enforcementpower.

Singhvi wants the implementation of series of guidelines to stop custodial death cases, according to him, “Despite repeated judgments and directives passed by the court, laying down various guidelines for prevention of custodial violence and custodial deaths, the implementation by the various states appears to be extremely lax, resulting in a steady stream of cases of gross custodial violence,” (Daily Mail reports)

He also mentioned that despite of having the second highest number of human rights cases (7988 in 2012), being reported in Delhi, it does not have its own human rights commission. Not only Delhi, the north eastern  states  such as Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Tripura and Nagaland – all disturbed states are  grappling with insurgency, foreign immigration, tribal warfare and ethnic violence – do  not have human rights commissions.

 He also pointed out that the State of U.P which reports the  highest number of cases (46,187), the State Humanright Commission is ineffective..

He suggested for the installation of CCTV cameras in police stations, automatic suspension and departmental proceedings against errant cops, and a directive to lower courts to adopt a “zero tolerance” approach in complaints of custodial excesses.

Next Story