Salary Challenge: Kerala Govt Moves SC Challenging Stay On “No Consent” Letter Sought From Employees Unwilling To Donate 1 Month Salary To CM's Flood Relief Fund

Apoorva Mandhani

25 Oct 2018 1:13 PM GMT

  • Salary Challenge: Kerala Govt Moves SC Challenging Stay On “No Consent” Letter Sought From Employees Unwilling To Donate 1 Month Salary To CMs Flood Relief Fund

    Days after the Kerala High Court stayed the condition in a Government Order (GO) that mandated a declaration from government employees unwilling to contribute their one month’s salary to the Chief Minister’s Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF), the State Government has approached the Supreme Court challenging this order.In the impugned order, the Bench comprising Justice CT Ravikumar and Justice...

    Days after the Kerala High Court stayed the condition in a Government Order (GO) that mandated a declaration from government employees unwilling to contribute their one month’s salary to the Chief Minister’s Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF), the State Government has approached the Supreme Court challenging this order.

    In the impugned order, the Bench comprising Justice CT Ravikumar and Justice AM Babu had opined that the impugned Clause 10 of the GO amounted to compulsion on the employees to join the government’s salary challenge initiative.

    The court had further taken note of the fact that the names of those who had sent dissenting letters pursuant to the GO were compiled and published. While appreciating the issuance of a circular directing HoDs to abstain from such practice, the court had highlighted the perils of publishing such lists.

    It had observed, “…we deem it appropriate to say that preparation of such lists would create a cleavage among the employees and any such publication, would depict person/class of persons as who stand against the noble cause. In such eventuality, they may be estimated in low profile by the public.”

    The court had then directed the Kerala Administrative Tribunal (KAT), which had considered a petition in this regard, to dispose of the case in a month's time, staying the clause in the meantime.

    “Taking into account the entire aspects and the impact of non-non-submission of letter of dissent and also of the prima facie view that it carries some element of compulsion, we are of the view that till the Tribunal disposes of the original application or passes interim order on the prayer for interim relief, Clause 10 in Annexure A1 shall stand stayed,” it  had ordered.

    The State now relies on a note passed by it on September 15, clarifying that the fund has to be realized strictly as contribution/donations and never to be effected by way of any compulsion.

    Asserting that this note was not considered by the Kerala High Court while granting the stay, the petition submits, “This note and the circular dated 06.10.2018 issued to all the head of the departments and other head of institutions by the Government not to prepare and publish details /lists of employees unwilling to contribute to the CMDRF  and that any violation of the said circular shall be viewed seriously have not been taken note of by the Division Bench of the High Court while passing the order of stay of clause 10 of the G.O. dated 11.09.2018 issued by the Government of Kerala for  collecting contribution for a noble cause.” 

    It further contends that similar orders have been passed by other states and authorities, including the Supreme Court, hence, providing legitimacy to its direction. It therefore challenges the stay, pointing out that it is preventing the State from collecting donations from even those employees who are willing to contribute to the fund.

    Read the Petition Here

    Next Story