Top Stories

#NEET Judgment Leak: Disclose Action Taken On Complaint Against Former CJI Altamas Kabir: CIC To SC Registry And DOJ [Read Order]

Apoorva Mandhani
4 May 2017 6:12 AM GMT
#NEET Judgment Leak: Disclose Action Taken On Complaint Against Former CJI Altamas Kabir: CIC To SC Registry And DOJ [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Central Information Commission on Wednesday directed the Supreme Court Registry and the Department of Justice to disclose action taken on a complaint against former Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir.

The Law Ministry was further directed to disclose the steps taken in the matter relating to the alleged leak of a judgement dated 18 July 2013, in the matter of Christian Medical College, Vellore v. Union of India. The verdict was posted on a private website before it was delivered by a Bench comprising Justice Kabir, Justice A.R. Dave and Justice Vikramajit Sen.

The Commission was hearing an appeal filed by RTI Activist Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, who had sought copies of complaints against Mr. Kabir as received by the Union Law Ministry. These complaints were allegedly filed by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer and M. Furquan, according to a news report referred to by the complainant.

Deciding the Appeal in favor of the complainant, the CIC further ordered that Mr. Agrawal be informed about the current status of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill, and other alternate measures proposed to ensure accountability, as also the status of the new Memorandum of Procedure and the National Litigation Policy.

Information Commissioner Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu also expressed anguish over the lack of transparency and accountability in the process of appointment of Judges, as also the ignorance of the constitutional provision for appointing jurists as Judges.

Further, noting that there exists no system for redressal of grievances against the judiciary, in any Court of India, Prof. Acharyulu observed, “A comprehensive mechanism need to be put in place to ensure both answerability and access to information about administration of justice including appointments, securing ethics, enforcing probity, complaints and action on them, to ensure transparency and accountability without compromising the basic constitutional character of the Independence of Judiciary, to be precise, it is not known who will discipline the judges or former judges, CJI or former CJI. Union Ministry of Law and Justice is expected to inform the appellant/citizen and the Commission, what is possible time required to introduce grievance-redressal system in High Courts and Supreme Court.”

Read the Order here.

Next Story