[Delhi Riots] Using 'Revolution' Word In Amravati Speech Not A Crime, No Call For Violence: Umar Khalid Argues For Bail In Delhi High Court

Seeking bail in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case, student activist Umar Khalid on Friday argued before the Delhi High Court that using the word 'revolution' in his speech given at Amravati in February 2020 was not a crime and that there was no call for violence or incitement of any sort in the same. A division bench comprising of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar was hearing the appeal filed by Umar Khalid challenging the Trial Court's order refusing him bail in case involving UAPA charges alleging a larger conspiracy in the riots of 2020. Senior Advocate Trideep Pais appearing for Umar Khalid was referring to the earlier query put forth by the Bench with regards to the use of words like 'inqalab' and 'krantikaari' while delivering the Amravati speech. While the Bench today asked Pais the context in which the words were used in the speech, Pais argued by no stretch of imagination can it be said that the speech was a call for violence, which was evident from the fact that the crowd was peacefully sitting in the chairs without being agitated or excited. At the outset, Justice Bhatnagar asked Pais about the words used in the speech regarding the Prime Minister like 'Hindustan me sab changa nahi' 'hindustan me Modi nanga si'.Pais argued that the words were used as metaphor to show that the real and practical issues of the Country were being hidden in reality. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar however remarked, "Some other words could have been used for the Prime Minister."To this, Pais responded "A speech is made on the 17 February, we all have our views about it. That doesn't make it as a crime. How is this terror or exhortation of violence?""Please see the visuals. That's the stage, there is a shamiana, a backdrop, the audience sitting on chairs... there is absolutely no chaos, no violence or nobody is getting excited. Your lordships is today seeing whether there was any terror due to this speech."On this, Justice Bhatnagar orally remarked "He said 'sab nanga si'. Whether mahatma gandhi ji mentioned any of these words against the queen? He is again and again saying we will follow Mahatma Gandhi ji."Pais responded by saying that in a democratic setup, various methods are used to arrive at a conclusion or in exposing what the Government of the day is doing and that one such way is by use of words and speeches. Pais then apprised the Bench about the literal meanings of the words used in the speech like 'inqalab' and 'kraantikaari'. To this, Justice Mridul said:"You used the expression inqalab and krantikaari. Reference to inqalab zindabad is possibly not relevant for this theory. All of us know what inqalab zindabad means. You used the expressions inqalab and krantikaari. That's what we asked you."Referring to an historian who had explained the meanings of the words, Pais responded that the word inqalab, according to the historian, meant revolution whereas the word Inqalab zindabad meant long live the revolution."It's not a crime to use the word revolution," Pais argued. He said "I used it in the context of the people standing against a discriminatory law and protesting against it.""I was asking for a change in law and asking that unjust law will have to be called back. That's also a revolution."Pais also added it would be a stretch of imagination to call the speech in question a call for violence and that the words were used in the context of call for boycotting an unjust law. "It sits well with a non violent protest and satyagrah towards change which is just," he added. "People who thought of revolution either in sphere of politics or economics do not have to resort to violence. Thought of violence shouldn't be mixed up with the word revolution," he argued. "My intention is to tell your lordships that revolution can be non violent and the speech was a call for non violence."To this, Justice Mridul said "The call to revolution doesn't have to effect the immediate gathering. It may affect many beyond those who were physically present."While concluding the hearing, the Bench said that since it was hearing the plea in a special bench, it would be convenient to hear the same on a day to day basis from Monday."We would like to finish this before the summer vacations," the Bench said. Accordingly, the matter will now be heard on Monday at 2:15 PM. Umar Khalid was denied bail by city's Karkardooma Court on March 24. He was arrested on 13 September, 2020 and has been under custody since.Earlier, while issuing notice in the appeal, the Court had said that the speech delivered by Umar Khalid at Amravati, was obnoxious, hateful, offensive and prima facie not acceptable.About the Trial Court OrderAdditional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat was of the view that Khalid had connectivity with many accused persons and that his presence throughout in several WhatsApp groups during the period beginning from the passing of the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill in December 2019 till the February 2020 riots, had to be...

[Delhi Riots] Using 'Revolution' Word In Amravati Speech Not A Crime, No Call For Violence: Umar Khalid Argues For Bail In Delhi High Court

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

[Delhi Riots] Using 'Revolution' Word In Amravati Speech Not A Crime, No Call For Violence: Umar Khalid Argues For Bail In Delhi High Court

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers