Madras High Court Monthly Digest - February 2023 [Citations 38 To 67]

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 38 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 66 NOMINAL INDEX P Markandan v. The Commissioner HR&CE Department, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 38 KC v. UK and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 39 KC v. UK, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 40 M/s. Amirta International Institute of Hotel Management v. The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 41 S v. V, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 42 Abbotsbury Owners' Association v. The Member Secretary, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 43 Dr Sri Hari Vignesh R v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 44 Dr. Jayakrishnan MP v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 45 R Rajesh v. Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 46 P Rathinam v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 47 G Subramanian v. K Phanindra Reddy IAS (batch cases), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 48 Sivankalai v. The State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 49 Flora Madiazagane v GG Hospital and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 50 Tvl Metal Trade Incorporation Versus The Special Secretary, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 51 The Federal Bank Ltd. V The Sub Registrar and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 52 G Devarajan v. The Chief Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 53 V Kamala v. The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 54 Venkatesan @ Venkatesh v. State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 55 Hina Suneet Sharma & Anr. versus M/s Nissan Renault Financial Services India Pvt Ltd, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 56 Jay Shah v. The Commissioner of Police and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 57 M/s Galatea Limited v. The Registrar General and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 58 Lakshmanan v. The Secretary SHRC, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 59 Shankar @ Savukku Shankar v. State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 60 C.Ve. Shanmugam v. Election Commission of India and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 61 State v. VD Mohanakrishnan, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 62 M/s. Transtonnelstroy – Afcons (JV) v. M/s.Chennai Metro Rail Ltd, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 63 C Kasthuriraj v. The State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 64 The Child rep. by her mother v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 65 M Narasimhan v. State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 66 Saminathan v Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 67 REPORTS Madras High Court Orders Shutdown Of Fake Websites Misleading Devotees, Earning Profit In Name Of Temples Case Title: P Markandan v. The Commissioner HR&CE Department Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 38 The Madras High Court has ordered closure of all illegal/unauthorised websites that have been created in the name of temples and which have been collecting funds from the devotees by misleading them. Noting that temples are places of worship which people visit to get eternal peace and harmony, the bench of Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Sathya Narayana Prasad held that temples should not turn into places for gaining profits. Thus, the court held that apart from the official website of the temple, the third parties should not be allowed to maintain websites in the name of temples and collect funds. 'Their Best Interest Can Be Ensured Only If They Return To Native Country': Madras High Court Directs Mother To Return Twins To Father In US Case Title: KC v. UK and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 39 While holding that the courts should always look into the best interest of the child in matters relating to custody, the Madras High Court has directed a mother to return her twin boys to their father in the US. The division bench of Justice PN Prakash (since retired) and Justice Anand Venkatesh said the children are now living in an environment which is alien to them since for nearly 13 years, they were in the US. The court followed the decision of the Supreme Court in Rohit ThammanaGowda v. State of Karnataka and Others wherein the Apex Court observed that the question of 'what is the wish/desire' of the child is different and distinct from the question 'what would be the best interest of the child'. The court had to thus look into the welfare of the child. Also Read: Division Bench’s Directions Contrary To Principles Laid Down By Supreme Court: Madras High Court Single Judge On Custody Battle For US-Born Twins Overseas Citizens, Persons Temporarily Residing In India Entitled To Seek Relief Under Domestic Violence Act: Madras High Court Case Title: KC v. UK Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 40 The Madras High court recently held that the law in India does not prohibit a person holding an Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) card or person temporarily residing here from seeking relief under the Domestic Violence Act in the Indian courts. Justice SM Subramaniam said upon Section 27 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (DV) Act "unambiguously stipulates that aggrieved person temporarily residing or carrying out business or employed is also falling within the ambit of the Domestic...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - February 2023 [Citations 38 To 67]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags