'Incorporated With Fraudulent Motive, Invoking Arbitration Against Antrix Not Bona Fide' : NCLT Orders Winding Up Of Devas Multimedia

The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru bench, has ordered the forcible liquidation and winding up of Devas Multimedia by allowing a petition filed Indian Space Research Organization's commercial arm Antrix Corporation Limited.The Tribunal held that Devas was incorporated in a "fraudulent manner to carry out unlawful purposes" and its management resorted to "fraudulent activities" in relation to the commercial contract with Antrix."The incorporation of Devas itself was with fraudulent motive and unlawful object to collude and connive with then officials of Antrix and to misuse/abuse process of law, to bring money into India and to divert it under dubious methods to foreign Countries", the Tribunal noted in its order passed on May 25. The Tribunal said that Antrix's petition satisfied that the requisite conditions under Section 271(1)(e) of the Companies Act 2013 to pass a winding-up order against Devas.Under Section 271, the Tribunal can order the winding up of a company if it is of the "opinion that the affairs of the company have been conducted in a fraudulent manner or the company was formed for fraudulent and unlawful purpose or the persons concerned in the formation or management of its affairs have been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or misconduct in connection therewith and that it is proper that the company be wound up". Also, the Tribunal can order so if it is "of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up". The NCLT has directed the Official Liquidator attached to the High Court of Karnataka to take expeditious steps to liquidate the company in order to prevent it from perpetuating its fraudulent activities and abusing the process of law by enforcing the arbitration tribunal award passed by the International Chamber of Commerce against Antrix in 2015.It may be noted that the ICC had passed an award directing Antrix to pay 1.2 Billion $ compensation to Devas for terminating the 2005 contract. In November 2020, the Supreme Court had stayed the proceedings to execute the award.Invocation of arbitration clause by Devas not bona-fideTaking a dim view of the proceedings initiated by Devas in international forum against Antrix, the NCLT observed :"Devas,while accepting the termination of Agreement in question before ICC Court, later changed its version and claimed huge damages. Though the Tribunal finds that Government of India has sovereign power to frame and change its policies, which includes termination of Agreement in question, it has continued to misuse process of law to its advantage. It has successfully taken Arbitration out of Country contrary to terms of Agreement. And even without permitting Antrix/Government to take appropriate course of action on the Award, it has precipitated the issue by initiating various proceedings before Indian and Foreign Courts for enforcement of the Award in question, when the validity of Award is under challenge before competent Court. When Devas continues to misuse legal status obtained by virtue of its incorporation as a Company, Antrix, after obtaining due sanction from the Government of India, has filed the instant Petition seeking to Wind up the Company"."By taking advantage, rather misusing the terms of Article 20 (Arbitration Clause) as contained in the Agreement, to pre-empt Antrix to settle the dispute first by referring to senior Management of both the parties, failing which to invoke arbitration clause, has hurriedly rushed to ICC Court on 01st July, 2011 by-passing due procedure as contemplated under the Agreement. Therefore, Antrix/UOI could not succeed in its efforts to invoke proper arbitration in terms of the above article, as the Apex Court of India did not agree to such proposal, mainly on the ground that invoking Arbitration by Antrix would amount to second Arbitration which was not tenable. Devas not only succeeded in takng the arbitration out of India, but also succeeded in conducting it on foreign soil, on the ground that one of Arbitrators could not travel to India, due to health conditions, though the seat of Arbitration shall be at New Delhi in India. In the normal circumstances, arbitration should be conducted at officially designated place. In the instant case, it is relevant to point out here that both the Companies involved are Indian Companies. Hence, the manner in which the Devas resorted to invoking Arbitration was not bonafide and not fair and the same was resorted to in perpetuation of its fraudulent as were being resorted to from the date of its incorporation"The Tribunal said that that Devas "in all its fairness" should have waited for the outcome of the proceedings pending against the validity of the award before attempting to enforce the same."When Antrix and Union of India have suffered huge ICC Award and are facing its enforcement proceedings, Devas, in all fairness, it should wait for the outcome of proceedings pending before Hon'ble Delhi against the validity of the Award. Therefore,...

'Incorporated With Fraudulent Motive, Invoking Arbitration Against Antrix Not Bona Fide' : NCLT Orders Winding Up Of Devas Multimedia

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

'Incorporated With Fraudulent Motive, Invoking Arbitration Against Antrix Not Bona Fide' : NCLT Orders Winding Up Of Devas Multimedia

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers