News Updates

Sunanda Pushkar Case: Special Judge Reserves Order In Tharoor's Plea Seeking Production of Pushkar's Tweets

Karan Tripathi
26 Nov 2019 10:14 AM GMT
Sunanda Pushkar Case: Special Judge Reserves Order In Tharoors Plea Seeking Production of Pushkars Tweets
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Special Judge Ajay Kumar Kuhar at Rouse Avenue Court has reserved order on Tharoor's application seeking a copy of Sunanda Pushkar's tweets to be produced before the court.

In the proceedings before Special CBI Judge today, the counsel appearing for Shashi Tharoor argued that no evidence or reports have been put on record to prove the actual cause of Sunanda Pushkar's death.

Appearing for Tharoor, Senior Counsel Vikas Pahwa submitted before the court that the investigation started in 2014, and till date, Prosecution has not presented the actual cause of Sunanda Pushkar's death.

He further pointed out that, both the SIT report and the report of the New Board of Health Ministry, had concluded that the cause of death is neither suicidal or homicidal.

Vikas Pahwa also informed the court that since no report has been able to ascertain the actual cause of death of Pushkar, the police have conducted secondary methods such as 'psychological autopsy'.

He went on to explain psychological autopsy as a valuable research conducted on competed suicide. It's done on complete information of the victim received from multiple informants and records to ascertain what was the mental condition of the victim of her death.

It was then argued that even the psychological autopsy report concludes that the cause of death can be neither suicidal or homicidal.

Mr Pahwa also informed the court that the night before her death, Sunanda Pushkar tweeted a joint statement which suggests that the couple 'had no issues with their marriage'.

It was also argued that despite having custody of everything, from phone to computer or the deceased, the police has peculiarly not put these tweets on record. To seek the same, an application was earlier moved under section 91 of Criminal Procedure Code. Mr Pahwa said:

'It is clear from both the CFSL Report as well as the chargesheet, that the prosecution do have the access to Twitter data of the deceased. They had collected the said data from the FSL which was retrieved from Pushkar's mobile phones, as seized by the police. Their chargesheet shows that they've relied on the tweet posted on 15/1/14. How did they get that tweet if they don't have the Twitter data?'

Arguing for the need to present the digital evidence before the court, Mr Pahwa cited cases such as Navjot Sandhu and Ajmal Kasab to show the importance of producing the digital evidence. He also said:

'Pushkar was very active on Twitter. She used to tweet almost every hour! These are relevant documents which cannot be hidden from the court'.

Pahwa also pointed out that it is evident in the Prosecutor's documents that they have analysed the social media accounts if the deceased. Therefore, how can they now say that they don't have a copy of the deceased's tweets? He added:

'Prosecution doesn't want to show the tweets because it goes against the narrative they've framed in the chargesheet'

Countering the same, Public Prosecutor argued that the said application under section 91 of CrPC is not maintainable at the stage of framing of charges. Further, it was also mentioned that the prosecution does not have the Twitter data of Sunanda Pushkar.

Prosecutor also argued that section 91 doesn't confer why right on the accused to ask for a document. Rather, it gives a discretionary power to the judge to call for any document of sterling quality which has been deliberately withheld by the Prosecutor.

It was further argued by the Prosecutor that Tharoor has shown no such document which is deliberately been withheld by the Prosecutor. The application filed by them is ambiguous about the kind of documents not supplied to them. He further added:

'They had all the documents for so long. Why didn't they move this application earlier? Section 91 has been invoked by them to waste time and delay the trial'.

Countering the point raised by Pahwa regarding the data received from the FSL, Prosecutor submitted that whatever data they received from the FSL was given in 3 DVDs which have been provided to the court.

Sunanda Pushkar died on January 17, 2014. As per the case of the prosecution, she died of poisoning due to consumption of Alprazolam.

In the last hearing, Delhi Police pressed charges against Tharoor under sections 498A, 306 or alternatively 302 of Indian Penal Code. Currently, Shashi Tharoor is out on bail.

Next Story
Share it