News Updates

NGT issues notice on petition on ban of microbeads in body care and cosmetic products [Read Petition]

Apoorva Mandhani
12 March 2016 6:53 AM GMT
NGT issues notice on petition on ban of microbeads in body care and cosmetic products [Read Petition]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The National Green Tribunal on Friday issued a notice on a petition demanding a complete ban on the usage of microbeads and microplastics in the manufacture, import and sale of various cosmetic and personal care products.

The petition, filed by Mr. Ashwini Kumar also demands that penalties be imposed on the companies causing environmental pollution by dealing in cosmetic and personal care products containing microbeads and microplastics. The petition will now come up on April 18, 2016.

Microplastics have been used to replace natural exfoliating materials like pumice, oatmeal, apricot or walnut husks in cosmetics and have been reported in a variety of products such as hand-cleansers, soaps, toothpaste, shaving foam, bubble bath, sunscreen, shampoo and facial scrubs. Their roundness and particle size create a ball-bearing effect in creams and lotions, resulting in a silky texture and spread ability.

The petition submits that the cosmetic and personal care products are washed down the drain after use, due to which microbeads flow through sewer systems around the world, eventually making their way to seas and oceans, where they contribute to the “huge chunk of plastic soup in the environment.”

It alleges that wastewater treatment plants are not efficient in capturing Microbeads due to their small size. They hence make their way to contribute to the increasing amount of microplastics, with unknown ecotoxicological consequences. These microplastics are also ingested by a wide range of marine organisms, as the receptors of tiny creatures do not recognize the plastic because of its miniscule size. These tiny organisms then carry the particles forward in the food chain.

Further, it submitted that these microbeads have been found to have cancer causing properties, when used in toothpastes or consumed as synthetic chemical compounds. The petition also referred to the statutes put in place in Illinois and California, banning the manufacture and sale of cosmetics that contain microbeads. Similar legislations have been proposed for New York, Michigan and Ohio.

Contending that the Centre has the power to prohibit the manufacture, sale or distribution of any drug and cosmetic in public interest under Section 26A of The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, the petition states, “Hence, all these cosmetic giants, who sell cosmetic products under the garb of natural products, must be banned from the manufacture and sale of cosmetic products, which contain microbeads/ microplastics as an ingredient in them. Once these cosmetics are used by the end-users, they are washed away and passed through drains and sewers, which go undetected through the filtration plants and find their way into streams and rivers and ultimately reach and settle at the sea-beds, thereby adding to the plastic soup and the water pollution in the environment.”

Read the petition here.

Next Story
Share it