Editors Pick

Petition filed in Madras HC demanding framing of Rules for appointment of Law Officers; notice issued [Read Petition]

Apoorva Mandhani
25 May 2016 8:34 AM GMT
Petition filed in Madras HC demanding framing of Rules for appointment of Law Officers; notice issued [Read Petition]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The High Court of Madras has issued notice on a Petition praying for formulation of rules and guidelines for appointment of Law Officers in a transparent and objective manner, by the State of Tamil Nadu and Union Territory Puducherry.

The Petition, filed by Advocate V. Vasanthakumar, contends, I respectfully submit that Law Officers should be law knowing person and not political leader knowing person. Law Officer post is not a political post, but, it is a public post with greater responsibility in the administration of Justice. Unless appointment of law officers is made fairly based on the merit, ability and integrity, the Justice delivery system would be in peril.

The petitioner argues that for appointment as Law Officers, integrity, capability, honesty, efficiency, legal acumen of the lawyers has become secondary and loyalty to the party in power gets primacy. It further contends that more than the legal acumen of advocates, it is the “unwritten qualifications” such as being the card holders of the concerned ruling party, appearing for party leaders, etc. that are considered.

The petition relies on the recent Apex Court judgment in the case of Pardeep Kumar Rapria v. State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3194 of 2016, wherein the Court had directed States to constitute a Selection Committee with such number of officers as the State Government may determine to select suitable candidates for appointment as State Counsel. The Secretary, Department of Law in each State was directed to be the Member-Secretary of the Selection Committee.

The directions were issued for Punjab and Haryana. The Court was however of the view that other States would do well to reform their system of selection and appointment to make the same more transparent, fair and objective if necessary by amending the relevant LR Manuals/Rules and Regulations on the subject.

In light of the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India, the petitioner had made a representation to the Centre and the State, citing the rules framed by States such as Maharashtra, Karnataka, Kerala, and Union of India for appointment of law officers, Conditions of services and remunerations etc. He had urged the States to comply with the directors issued by the Supreme Court. However, no reply was received on the same.

The petitioner has hence approached the vacation Bench of the High Court, in light of the fact that the new Government is set to take charge after the election results of the 2016 State Election.

It thereby prays for an order of injunction, restraining the Respondents from appointing the Law Officers to represent the State of Tamil Nadu and Union Territory Puducherry, without following a transparent procedure in their appointment.

Read the petition here.

Next Story