Right to Practise Law is not absolute; Restriction imposed by Section 36(4) of ID Act is not violative of Advocates Act/Article 19(1)(g); Allahabad HC

Right to Practise Law is not absolute; Restriction imposed by Section 36(4) of ID Act is not violative of Advocates Act/Article 19(1)(g); Allahabad HC

Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the entire article, get a premium account.
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?