4 Sep 2018 4:14 PM GMT
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to a hear a petition seeking a direction to the authorities to ensure that physical access to the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) is limited only to authorised engineers of Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL) and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). While ECIL manufactures EVMs, BEL undertakes the upkeep and maintenance of EVMs during...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to a hear a petition seeking a direction to the authorities to ensure that physical access to the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) is limited only to authorised engineers of Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL) and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). While ECIL manufactures EVMs, BEL undertakes the upkeep and maintenance of EVMs during elections.
The Bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan, while not issuing notice yet, directed the petitioner, Uttarakhand based journalist Ashish Goyal, to serve the copy on the counsel for Election Commission of India (ECI). The matter has been posted for further hearing after two weeks.
The petition draws the Court’s attention to a report released in September 2006 by the Expert Committee for the Technical Evaluation of the Upgraded Electronic Voting Machine. The report had while approving the upgraded EVMs, acknowledged the possibility of their tampering by introducing an activated “Trojan horse” sub-program through physical replacement by a tainted microchip.
It further relies on a manual on Electronic Voting Machine issued in January 2017, which provides that the First Level Checking (FLV) of the EVMs should be carried out only by authorized engineers of ECIL and BEL.
The petition then refers to the General Assembly elections that took place in Uttarakhand on 11 March 2017, claiming that post-election, the officials moved all the used EVMs to a different store when the counting had finished, without intimating the concerned political parties or their respective candidates.
This, it said, was done in violation of the standard protocol that EVMs used in an election are to remain untouched for 45 days. RTI requests had further revealed that the consultants engaged in the Uttarakhand General Elections, 2017 belonged to an external manpower supply agency.
The petition now asserts that such breaches raise serious concerns and apprehensions about the possibility of a security breach during the elections. It further contends that “the conduct of free and fair elections is bedrock on which our democracy is founded. The failure and/or lacunae in the process of conducting elections directly breaches and violates the Rule of law and as such Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.”
Relying on RTI responses, the petition also claims a confusion in the number of EVMs which have been manufactured and which are currently in use in the country. Highlighting such inconsistencies and possible breaches, the petition finally seeks the following reliefs: