Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Serpent Beneath The Falcon’s Shadow

S.Nikhil Sankar
14 Jan 2016 5:14 AM GMT
Serpent Beneath The Falcon’s Shadow

NUT SHELLA statutory prescription that has beckoned much litigation has recently been granted as a boon on a platter to upcoming economic tycoons in private sector; is the point of discussion that has been attempted to ventilate through this pieceDays passed away; as the undulate ocean waveLife galloped; with the swiftness of a horseAs the tulips; await its autumn springSo shall the law;...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?


A statutory prescription that has beckoned much litigation has recently been granted as a boon on a platter to upcoming economic tycoons in private sector; is the point of discussion that has been attempted to ventilate through this piece

Days passed away; as the undulate ocean wave

Life galloped; with the swiftness of a horse

As the tulips; await its autumn spring

So shall the law; evolve with the efflux of time.


  1. The fiscal policy of the democratic government as evidenced through the financial budget presented in May 2015 has ushered a sea change of waves to the shore, catastrophically having its vicious fangs which may be a bane for the beneficiary of financial assistance juxtapose to the benefactor who has been provided an armour of flawless power; be it like a boon in the platter to tackle the financial conundrum of recovery.
  2. The Ministry of Finance has vociferously with much vigour and vehemence  justified the recent budgetary scheme to grant Non Banking Financial Corporations (Hereinafter referred to as ‘NBFCs’) as well as NBFC –Infrastructural companies (Hereinafter referred to as ‘NBFC-IFC’)  already resorting to chicanery tactics elsewhere ,   being so , boasting of  to be in the pedestal worth an asset size of over 500 Crores/300 Crores respectively to be equipped  with  the unbridled power to recover bad loans invoking  provisions of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002(Hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’)  ,principally  so as to guarantee  that they increase monetary assistance to novel infrastructure projects.

C.Its pertinent to note that under the umbrella of the act, the erstwhile lenders i.e. ;(banks and other Financial institutions) thus notified possessed vibgyor powers as provided in the second limb of the act, i.e. enforcement of security interest by resorting to coercive steps like taking possession of the secured asset  from defaulting borrower without waiting for court intervention, on expiry of statutory notice period  after the loan gets relegated to the status of a ‘Non Performing Asset’.

D.Prior to the grant of the said facility  to ‘NBFC’s as well as ‘NBFC-IFC’s,such institutions had to resort to conventional legal methods towards recovery of assets like  litigation towards cheating/dishonour of cheque etc or bypass through  alternative resorts synonymous to arbitral proceedings which were nonetheless toothless tigers. The country failing to achieve the infrastructure development target envisaged as per the anachronistic  erstwhile five year plan policy ,the government with the motto of ‘NATION FIRST’ is keen on tapping all resources for fund raising including foreign as well as domestic investments leading to infrastructural growth and development.

The armour of powers of the ‘Act’, would provide a new spirit and energy to the existing ‘NBFC’s as well as ‘NBFC-IFC’s ,the later formulated as per norms issued by Reserve Bank Of India, the apex body of banking sector in India, in 2010.An ‘NBFC-IFC’ happens to be  a non deposit taking ‘NBFC’ with majority of assets(Say 75%) in infrastructural loans and having net worth of Rs 300 crore.Besides they need to have a minimum credit rating of class ‘A’ or its equivalency approved by authorised rating agency coupled with capital adequacy ratio of 15% as well as Tier I capital at 10%.

  1. An ‘NBFC’ as well as ‘NBFC-IFC’ by virtue of being classified as a ‘financial institution’ (Hereinafter referred to as ‘FI’) u/s 2(39) of the Companies Act, 2013,r/w S.45 I clause (c) of the Reserve Bank of India Act,1934,would also augur well to the definition of ‘financial institution’ as contemplated u/s 2(1)(m)(i)of the ‘Act’.The concept of an ‘NBFC’ is further moulded so well u/s 45 I clause(f) of the Reserve Bank of India Act,1934,the same of which is traceable u/s 2(1)(m)(iv) of the ‘Act’ also satisfying the definition of a ‘financial institution’.
  2. It is pertinent to observe that in pursuance of getting the status of ‘PFI’ under the ‘Act’ , ‘NBFC’ as well as ‘NBFC-IFC’ have found a way to recover bad debts and to foreclose the security. It is expected that these developments would further strengthen the recovery capabilities of the said institutions. The government by such a decision had elevated ‘NBFC’ as well as ‘NBFC-IFC’ to ‘financial institutions‘ under the Act, giving them an impetus to lend freely , though they are  few in number .

H.The stamp of approval of the ‘Act’ in recent times has come out by the latest judgment of apex court in Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P. Ltd v M/s. Haryana Concast Limited & Anr(CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3646 OF 2011 dated 29 -12-15) which opined as follows There is no lacuna or ambiguity in the SARFAESI Act to warrant reading something more into it. It is a complete code and there is nothing lacking in the Act”.

I.Be that so, in this society of different vicissitudes , a blanket grant of statutory empowerment to players in private sector would lead to wider ramifications in this pluralist human community. Hence as enunciated through various judicial precedents, necessary guidelines are to be formulated to properly monitor, regulate and channelize such exercise of powers with due regard and adherence of the due process of law as well as ensuring protection of ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ as well as ‘HUMAN’ rights on a wider spectrum. To call the shots; let us recall the following wordings from a renowned Hollywood blockbuster:-

With great power comes- great Responsibility”  ‘Spider-Man’


  • Working group on the concerns and issues in the NBFC sector, Reports and Recommendations, Reserve Bank Of India,2011 as seen in last visited on 01/01/16.
  • Circular issued by the Reserve Bank Of India,RBI/2009-10/316DNBS.PD.CC No.168/03.02.089/2009-10 dated 12/02/10.
  • last visited on 03/01/16.
  • last visited on 29/12/15.
  • last visited on 29/12/15.
  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002 as amended in January 2013 by The Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws(Amendment)Act,2011.
  • Companies Act,2013 as amended in May 2015,by the Companies(Amendment) Act,2015.
  • Reserve Bank Of India Act,1934 as amended in January 2013, by Repo in Corporate Debt Securities (Amendment) Directions, 2013

Nikhil ShankerAdvocate, High Court of Kerala.  email.nikhilsankar @
Next Story
Share it