News Updates

Slamming Gender Discrimination, SC moots permanent Commission for women Navy officers of all branches [Read Order]

Live Law News Network
21 Nov 2015 4:35 AM GMT
Slamming Gender Discrimination, SC moots permanent Commission for women Navy officers of all branches [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Supreme Court has slammed the Indian Navy for gender discrimination, unreasonable classification and strongly favoured permanent commission for women officers in all wings after they complete their short service commission.

Navy’s September 26, 2008 rule offered permanent commission to women officers who joined after the date but only in education, law and naval architecture branches.

Justice T S Thakur made the observations while hearing an appeal filed by the Navy and Ministry of Defence against the Delhi High Court order asking it to grant permanent commission to 19 women officers in the education, logistics and ATC branches. They had completed 14 years of their Short Service Commission.

Significantly the SC directed that a total of 12 petitioners who were in logistics and ATC branches be allowed to continue in service till they decided the Navy and MoD’s appeal

Senior lawyer Rekha Palli appearing for the lady officers vociferously argued how after using their services for 14 long years the women officers were being thrown out of service

Endorsing it, a bench headed by Justice T S Thakur asked Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi “once you decided to give a permanent commission then you cannot have a classification. Such discrimination is bad. How come they were once useful and once it comes to benefits they are not useful?”

As he replied that permanent commission for women SSC officers is something that the law itself bars and such an order would annihilate the functional autonomy of the armed forces, the judge, referring to the 2008 rule told the AG “the government itself created the problem now you face it”.

“We were being liberal”, the AG responded to which justice Thakur reacted in a lighter vein by saying “you will lose 50% votes if you are not liberal”

The MoD had urged the SC to stay the HC order, saying it “severely affects the operational structure and administrative exigencies in the Indian Navy” and also “result in disturbing the seniority of existing personnel and their promotional avenues”.

“It would further cause financial and other constraints on the government and has resulted in the respondents (women officers) being provided with something that the law itself bars… the division bench (of HC) has effectively overridden the statutory provision and dictated the policy of the Indian Navy for recruiting women officers,” it adds.
The Navy has maintained that it has not discriminated against women, and that no male officer in the same cadres, who were recruited under the SSC, was offered permanent commission.

The Navy has said that the HC nullified its policy without any cogent reason or basis and became a “decision-maker for the Indian Navy, which has consistently been avoided by constitutional courts.”

It has opposed the HC’s observation that since all the three services — Army, Navy and Air Force — are under the same ministry, they should not have different policies. “There are wide variations between the functions of all three services and each service is given the liberty to choose the policies conducive to meet service-specific standards,” says the appeal petition.

Read the order here.

Next Story