Supreme Court Upholds Levy Of GST On Lottery, Betting And Gambling

In a notable judgment delivered on Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax(GST) on lotteries, betting and gambling.A three-judge bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan dismissed a writ petition filed by Skill Loto Solutions Pvt Ltd challenging the levy of GST on lotteries as violative of Articles 14,19(1)(g), 301 and 304 of the Constitution of India.Petitioner's argumentThe prime argument of Skill Loto, an authorized lottery agent for the State of Punjab, was that lottery cannot be regarded as 'goods' within the meaning of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(CGST Act). It was argued that 'lottery' was in the nature of an actionable claim. The definition of 'goods' under Article 366(12) of the Constitution include only "materials, commodities and articles" and not "actionable claims". However, the definition of 'goods' under Section 2(52) of the GST Act includes 'actionable goods'. This is also contrary to the definition of 'goods' under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, which also excludes 'actionable claims'.So, the argument was that the statute cannot prescribe a definition which is contrary to the Constitution. It was also pointed out that as per Item Number 6 under Schedule III to the Act, 2017 all actionable claims except "lottery, betting and gambling" are treated as neither goods nor supplies. Thus, all actionable claims except 'lottery, betting and gambling' have been exempted from GST. This was challenged as discriminatory.Court's findingThe Court observed that the definition of goods under Article 366(12) of the Constitution was inclusive and there was no intention to give any restrictive meaning to goods."The Constitution framers were well aware of the definition of goods as occurring in the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 when the Constitution was enforced. By providing an inclusive definition of goods in Article 366(12), the Constitution framers never intended to give any restrictive meaning of goods"(Paragraph 34)It noted that the GST Act 2017 was enacted by the Parliament in exercise of power conferred under Article 246Aof the Constitution."When the Parliament has been conferred power to make law with respect to goods and services, the legislative power of the Parliament is plenary", the judgment observed.The Court further noted that the Constitution Bench judgment in Sunrise Associates vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, (2006) 5 SCC 603 categorically held that lottery is actionable claim.The judgment authored by Justice Ashok Bhushan observed :"We are of the view that definition of goods under Section 2(52) of the Act,2017 does not violate any constitutional provision nor it is in conflict with the definition of goods given under Article 366(12). Article 366 clause(12) as observed contains an inclusive definition and the definition given in Section 2(52) of Act, 2017 is not in conflict with definition given in Article 366(12). As noted above the Parliament by the Constitution(One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 inserted Article 246A. a special provision with respect to goods and services tax. The Parliament was fully empowered to make laws with respect to goods and services tax. Article 246Abegins with non obstante clause that is"Notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246and 254", which confers very wide power to make laws.The power to make laws as conferred by Article 246A fully empowers the Parliament to make laws with respect to goods and services tax and expansive definition of goods given in Section 2(52) cannot be said to be not in accord with the constitutional provisions(Para 49)"The Court held that the inclusion of actionable claim in definition"goods" as given in Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is not contrary to the legal meaning of goods and is neither illegal nor unconstitutional.No hostile discrimination in taxing only lottery, betting and gamblingThe Court rejected the argument that imposing tax only on 'lottery, betting and gambling' while exempting other actionable claims was discriminatory.In that regard, the bench observed :"Lottery, betting and gambling are well known concepts and have been in practice in this country since before independence and were regulated and taxed by different legislations. When Act, 2017 defines the goods to include actionable claims and included only three categories of actionable claims, i.e., lottery,betting and gambling for purposes of levy of GST, it cannot be said that there was no rationale for including these three actionable claims for tax purposes. Regulation including taxation in one or other form on the activities namely lottery, betting and gambling has been in existence since last several decades. When the parliament has included above...

Supreme Court Upholds Levy Of GST On Lottery, Betting And Gambling

Manu Sebastian

Tags