Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Is Mandatory; Suits Filed Violating This Liable To Be Rejected : Supreme Court

In a judgment having far reaching impact in commercial litigations, the Supreme Court on Wednesday declared that Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, which mandates pre- institution mediation, is mandatory and suits which are filed violating this mandate are liable to be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.The Court has however made this declaration effective from August 22, 2022.A bench comprising Justices KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy gave this ruling in the batch case M/s Patil Automation Private Limited and others versus Rakheja Engineers Private Ltd and connected matters.The seminal question which arose for consideration in this case was whether the statutory pre-litigation mediation contemplated under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory.Answering the issue in the affirmative, the bench held as follows :"We declare that Section 12A of the Act is mandatory and hold that any suit instituted violating the mandate of Section 12A must be visited with rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11. This power can be exercised even suo moto by the court. We, however, make this declaration effective from 20.08.2022 so that concerned stakeholders become sufficiently informed. Still further, we however direct that in case plaints have been already rejected and no steps have been taken within the period of limitation, the matter cannot be reopened on the basis of this declaration. Still further, if the order of rejection of the plaint has been acted upon by filing a fresh suit, the declaration of prospective effect will not avail the plaintiff. Finally, if the plaint is filed violating Section 12A after the jurisdictional High Court has declared Section 12A mandatory also, the plaintiff will not be entitled to the relief".What does Section 12A say?According to Section 12A, any suit, which does not contemplate any urgent interim relief under the Commercial Courts Act, shall not be instituted unless the plaintiff exhausts the remedy of pre- institution mediation in accordance with such manner and procedure as may be prescribed by rules made by the Central Government. Such mediation has to be done before the authorities authorized by the Central Government.The provisions gives the authorities a three-month deadline for the completion of mediation, which can be further extended by two months with the consent of the parties. The mediation period will not be counted for the purposes of limitation under the Limitation Act.Any settlement arrived at the mediation can be executed as if it was an award passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. This provision was inserted in the Act by the 2018 amendment, which came into force in 03.07.2018.In the case before the Supreme Court, the appellants had sought the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground that the suit was filed by the respondents without exhausting the remedy of pre-litigation mediation. However, the Commercial Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint. The Supreme Court considered the case along with a host of other appeals raising the same issue.Senior Advocate Sanjeev Anand and Advocates Ayush Negi,Sharath Chandran appeared for the appellants arguing that Section 12A was mandatory. Advocate Saket Sikri, appearing for the respondents, argued that the provision was directory.Section 12A not a mere procedural provision, says Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court observed in the judgment that Section 12A cannot be described as a mere procedural law. "Exhausting pre-institution mediation by the plaintiff, with all the benefits that may accrue to the parties and, more importantly, the justice delivery system as a whole, would make Section 12A not a mere procedural provision. The design and scope of the Act, as amended in 2018, by which Section 12A was inserted, would make it clear that Parliament intended to give it a mandatory flavour. Any other interpretation would not only be in the teeth of the express language used but, more importantly, result in frustration of the object of the Act and the Rules", the judgment authored by Justice KM Joseph stated(Para 43).Provision mandatory in a class of suits not requiring urgent interim relief, this lightens the load of judgesThe judgment further observed :"At this juncture, it must be immediately noticed that the Law-giver has, in Section 12A, provided for pre- institution mediation only in suits, which do not contemplate any urgent interim relief. Therefore, pre- institution mediation has been mandated only in a class of suits. We say this for the reason that in suits which contemplate urgent interim relief, the Law-giver has carefully vouch-safed immediate access to justice as contemplated ordinarily through the courts. The carving out of a class of suits and selecting them for compulsory mediation, harmonises with the attainment of the object of the law. The load on the Judges is lightened. They can...

Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Is Mandatory; Suits Filed Violating This Liable To Be Rejected : Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Is Mandatory; Suits Filed Violating This Liable To Be Rejected : Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers