Supreme Court To Hear UP Govt Challenge Against Allahabad HC Order To Enhance Salaries Of Court Staff

The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, agreed to decide the plea of the Uttar Pradesh Government challenging the order of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, which had, in essence, affirmed the Single Judge's direction to the the Government to take necessary steps to approve the Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Conditions of Service and Conduct) (Amendment) Rules, 2005 framed by the Chief Justice of the High Court under Article 229(2) of the Constitution for enhancing the pay-scales of Class IV employees of the High Court to that of their counterparts in the Delhi High Court, on merits. On a previous occasion (28.01.2019), as per the request of the parties, the Court had granted time to convene a meeting between the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court and the Chief Minister of U.P., as also predicated in the impugned order. But, on Tuesday, a Bench comprising Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and J.B. Pardiwala was apprised that it would not be possible for the State Government to accept the amendments made by the Chief Justice, considering the financial implication of the same across the State. In view of the same, the Bench thought it fit to hear the matter on merits. Justice Khanwilkar was of the opinion that the High Court cannot decide the salary of its employees, it can only make suggestions to the Government. "The High Court itself cannot decide the salary. For that there is a Pay Commission. The High Court can only make suggestions." On the issue of parity of salary, he noted - "How can you equate someone working in Taluka Court with a person working in District Court in Delhi. It is that principle will come into play - can unequals be treated equally?" On 26.07.2012, the U.P. Government had declined to grant approval to the Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Conditions of Service and Conduct) (Amendment) Rules, 2005. The same was challenged before the High Court by its Class IV Employees' Association. The Single Judge quashed the State Government's order and directed it to take appropriate steps to approve the amendments within six weeks. It was also directed that Class IV employees of the High Court would be entitled to higher pay-scales from the date the amendments were incorporated in the Rules and the arrears of difference of salary would be paid to them within six months from the date the Rules are approved. The State approached the Division Bench impugning the Single Judge's order on the grounds of financial implication, and adverse effect on other employees. Referring to a catena of judgments of the Apex Court, the Division Bench observed that absolute control over its staff has been vested in the High Court free from interference of the Government, subject to the limitations imposed by Article 229(2) of the Constitution. It further added that the Supreme Court while considering the scope of Article 146 and Article 229 of the Constitution had recognised that it is a legislative power conferred upon the Chief Justice. Thus, the recommendations of the Chief Justice should not be rejected except on the cogent and sufficient reason. The Division Bench noted - "We hope and trust that the Government would bear in mind that matters relating to nature of work performed by the employees of the High Court can best be appreciated by the Chief Justice of the High Court and when the recommendations made by the four Judge Committee dealing extensively with regard to the nature of work performed by Class IV employees of the High Court have been accepted by the Chief Justice and the Rules have been amended, the Government will, as is expected, respect the views. However, if there is still any doubt, the Government will arrange a meeting between the Chief Justice of the High Court and the Chief Minister of the State for exchange of thoughts and views. Since the Rules were amended in 2005, we expect the Government to take a decision expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before the Chief Secretary of the State. It is also expected that on approval being granted to the Amendment Rules, a decision will also be taken regarding the date from which the benefits would accrue to the Class IV employees of the High Court." Background In 1997, the Class IV Employees' Association had filed writ petition for a direction to the State Government to grant pay-scales of Rs.975-1660 and Rs.1000-1750 in place of Rs.750-940 and Rs.775-1025 respectively to Class IV employees of the High Court. This petition was allowed on 06.02.1998. In appeal, the Division Bench set aside the order, but it was left open to the Chief Justice of the High Court to take a decision regarding grant of higher pay-scales. This order was assailed by the Association before the Apex Court, which noted that Chief Justice of the High Court can constitute a Committee whose...

Supreme Court To Hear UP Govt Challenge Against Allahabad HC Order To Enhance Salaries Of Court Staff

Sohini Chowdhury

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sohini Chowdhury

Supreme Court To Hear UP Govt Challenge Against Allahabad HC Order To Enhance Salaries Of Court Staff

Sohini Chowdhury

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sohini Chowdhury

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers