Cover Story

Upload all FIRs on Police website; provide copy of FIR to accused within 24 hours: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Apoorva Mandhani
30 Nov 2015 11:52 AM GMT
Upload all FIRs on Police website; provide copy of FIR to accused within 24 hours: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Allahabad High Court has directed the State Government to ensure that all FIRs be uploaded on the website of the U.P. Police, except in exceptional circumstances, “where the need to preserve the identity of the victim, the course of proper investigation, the protection of witnesses and other aspects involving a predominant consideration of public interest may warrant the FIR not being uploaded on the website.”

The Bench, comprising Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Yashwant Varma directed that the decision to not upload the FIR should be taken by an officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, after recording the reasons in writing.

The Court was hearing a petition filed by the Youth Bar Association of India, which had demanded that all FIRs, lodged in every Police Station within the territory of the State of IP be uploaded on the official website of the UP Police, i.e. “”, as early as possible preferably within 24 hours from the time of lodging.

It also demanded that certified copy of the FIRs be supplied to the accused/his representative/pairokar/agent as early as possible preferably within 24 hours of the application being made in this regard.

The Court was presented with the statement of the Superintendent of Police (Crimes), made on behalf of the Director General of Police. In the statement, the authorities had stated that they had no objection to the FIRs being uploaded on the website. However, they listed down six situations where uploading of the FIR would not be viable. These included:

  • Allegations of offences committed under Section 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376E and 377 of the Indian Penal Code. Revealing the names of victims of crimes under these sections is punishable under Section 228A of IPC.
  • Allegations of offences committed under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
  • Prohibition of publication of name, etc., of juvenile or child in need of care and protection involved in any proceeding, as mandated under Section 21 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
  • FIRs regarding activities relating to terrorism, national security and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967
  • FIRs alleging offences under Official Secrets Act, 1963
  • Allegations of offences inciting animosity between religious groups and under IPC, including offences under Section 153A, 295, 295A, 296, 297 and 298 of IPC

The Court accepted these categories of cases as exceptional and further noted that the list may not necessarily be exhaustive.

The Petitioner, Youth Bar Association of India has also filed a similar PIL before the Nainital High Court. This petition has been admitted by the Court. It is filing a PIL on similar grounds before the Apex Court of India, seeking direction for all the States to upload each and every FIR on the official website.

Earlier in 2010, Delhi High Court had also issued directions in this regard, in the case of Court on its own motion v. State, Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 468 of 2010. It had taken on record a mechanism suggested by the Additional Solicitor General and directed that copies should be provided to the accused or any person acting on his behalf, within twenty four hours of making such an application. Ten instructions were issued by the Court, making provision for making the FIR available in the public domain, and providing a copy to the accused, well in time.

The judgment of the Delhi High Court was subsequently followed by a Single Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court on 19 December 2014 in Cr.MMO No. 276 of 2014.

Image from here.

Read the order here.

Next Story