Editors Pick

When Husband is alive, Wife cannot claim maintenance from in-laws; Gujarat HC [Read Order]

Apoorva Mandhani
20 Feb 2016 1:13 PM GMT
When Husband is alive, Wife cannot claim maintenance from in-laws; Gujarat HC [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

In a recent order, the High Court of Gujarat held that in-laws are not liable for payment of maintenance to the wife, if her husband was still alive.

Referring to various Supreme Court judgments, Justice J.B.Pardiwala  reiterated the established position of law and observed, “From the principles enunciated in the above referred decisions, it is apparent that any right which the wife has during the subsistence of her marriage and during the lifetime of her husband is against the husband and she has no right to claim any relief against the father-in-law or sister-in-law or any of the relatives of her husband inasmuch as the obligation to maintain her lies only on her husband.”

The Court was hearing a petition challenging an order of the City Sessions Court, which had order payment of monthly maintenance of Rs. 9000 to Ms. Zahinbanu Pirzada, to be paid by her mother-in-law and brother-in-law.

Ms. Zahinbanu Pirzada had initiated proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. On account of matrimonial disputes, she was now residing at her parental home and had prayed for maintenance.

The prayer for maintenance had been rejected by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, in June, 2013. The City Sessions Court had reversed this order and maintenance awarded to be paid by her mother-in-law and brother-in-law, since her husband was untraceable. This order had been challenged by the High Court.

The question for consideration before the Court was whether any liability could be fastened on the brother-in-law and mother-in-law so far as payment of maintenance under the provisions of the Act is concerned. The question was answered in negative.

Read the order here.

Next Story