Top Stories

Wife attending late night parties is not ‘Cruelity’ to Husband : Bombay HC [Read the Judgment]

Ashok Kini
16 Aug 2015 7:46 AM GMT
Wife attending late night parties is not ‘Cruelity’ to Husband : Bombay HC [Read the Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Bombay High Court has held , that wife attending late night party cannot be called ‘Cruelty’ to husband. Justice M.L.Tahaliyani said Socialising to some extent in the present society is permissible.” The husband had approached the court for divorce, through a second appeal, citing misbehaviour of his wife on many occasions, her frequent late night parties and outburst on smaller issues which made his life miserable.

The court observed that there is no evidence to come to   the   conclusion  that  on   a   particular  date   his wife   was drunk or had excess liquor and had come to the house at a particular time.  On the contrary, she had evidence that the Appellant was once found in a company of female  friend, who   was  extremely  drunk  and  she was  brought  at house of the Appellant because she was unable to go alone.  Holding that life of husband and wife in this case is not like that of a   normal life of conservative married couple as them appeared to be in the nature of socialising and were in habit of enjoying parties, the court dismissed the appeal filed by the Husband.

The High Court further held, “ The allegation on the basis of which the Appellant claims that he was subjected to cruelty by his wife, have been made by the Appellant also against his wife¬Respondent No.1.  It therefore, appears that both of them were in habit of socialising and it is possible that they misunderstood each other.  There is no concrete evidence that the Appellant was treated with cruelty by Respondent No.1 and therefore, he is not entitled for a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty”

The Trial Court had found the evidence of the Appellant husband reliable and had come to the conclusion that the Appellant was treated with cruelty and therefore, he was entitled for decree of divorce. The first appellate court had set aside the Trial court judgment. It was against the appellate court judgment, the husband approached High Court, through a second appeal.

Read the Judgment here.

Next Story