[BREAKING] Tokyo Paralmypics : International Paralympic Committee Refuses Additional Participant; Supreme Court Disposes Shooter Naresh Kumar Sharma's Plea
In a dramatic twist in the case of 5-time Paralympian shooter and Arjuna Award winner Naresh Kumar Sharma, the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) has said that it is not possible to include an additional participant from India in the Tokyo Paralympic games starting from August 24.Yesterday, the Supreme Court had directed the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI) to recommend his name...
In a dramatic twist in the case of 5-time Paralympian shooter and Arjuna Award winner Naresh Kumar Sharma, the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) has said that it is not possible to include an additional participant from India in the Tokyo Paralympic games starting from August 24.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court had directed the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI) to recommend his name as an additional participant in the 50 meter parashooter event in the Tokyo Paralympics, after prima facie observing that his exclusion was arbitrary. The Court had also directed the PCI to report compliance today.
However, in an email to PCI, the international committee informed that India has earned only 10 slots in the qualification event, and hence an additional slot cannot be given.
In view of the objection raised by the IPC, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for Sharma, requested for a direction to the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court to take up Sharma's pending appeal tomorrow itself. Before the High Court, Sharma has raised arguments to include him by dislodging another participant.
Accepting the request made by Singh, a bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna disposed of the special leave petition with liberty to approach the High Court. The bench also requested the High Court to consider the matter expeditiously.
Naresh Kumar Sharma had approached the Court aggrieved by the "arbitrary and biased" decision of the PCI in not selecting him for the Tokyo event.
Yesterday, a bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, BR Gavai and Krishna Murari had directed the PCI to recommend his name as an additional participant, without dislodging already selected candidates, in the Tokyo event. He had earlier approached the Delhi High Court challenging his exclusion from the international event meant for physically challenged participants. Although the High Court observed that there was arbitrariness in the Committee's decision, it did not pass immediate orders for his inclusion in the list.
In that background, he approached the Supreme Court. Senior Advocate Vikas Singh made a mention of the matter before the Chief Justice of India yesterday morning for urgent consideration, saying that the matter will become infructuous otherwise.
Sharma had preferred an appeal before a Division bench of the Delhi High Court from a Single Judge order, refusing to interfere with the decision of the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI), the apex body for promotion and development of Para Sports in India, to not shortlist him for the Tokyo Games 2020.
He stated that though the Single judge had come to a finding that there was bias and favoritism in PCI's conduct and an investigation was ordered, no relief was granted to him. He stated that notice was issued on his appeal which is slated to be heard on August 6, by when the matter will become infructuous as today is the last day for acceptance of applications by the International Paralympics Committee.
Sharma had contended that the Selection Committee of PCI wrongly applied the eligibility criteria specified under the National Sports Development Code of India 2011, while shortlisting the candidates. He had complained that the Committee wrongly selected one Deepak to participate in Tokyo Paralympic in R7 event, in his place.
It is his case that to be eligible for participating in the 2020 Tokyo Paralympics, a para shooter must have participated in at least two international competitions approved by the WSPS (World Shooting Para Sports). Singh pointed out that the said Deepak had merely participated in one such event and the Committee has wrongly considered Serbia Grand Prix for calculating his marks, even though the said event is not a part of the recognized WSPS competition in terms of Rule 1.2 and 2.9.
Before the High Court, PCI had contended that its endeavor was to select the best candidates for the games and that Deepak was found to be the one with the highest score in the relevant category. It was also informed to the Court that the Serbia Grand Prix was one of the World Shooting Para Sports (WSPS) events in which Sharma voluntarily chose not to participate.