Bangladesh Supreme Court upholds Mir Quasem Ali’s death sentence [Read Judgment]

Vidushi Sahani
1 Sep 2016 10:17 AM GMT
Bangladesh Supreme Court upholds Mir Quasem Ali’s death sentence [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Bangladesh Supreme Court on Tuesday quashed a review appeal by Jamaat-e-Islami leader, Mir Quasem Ali and upheld his death sentence for ‘crimes against humanity ’during the Bangladesh war of independence in 1971. He was earlier convicted by the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICTB) in 2014 which was also upheld by the Supreme Court in March this year. The court held that the sentence was ‘proportionate to the gravity of the crime’.

He was convicted on several counts including murder, confinement, torture and incitement to religious hatred during the country’s Liberation war of 1971. As per a report in The Hindu, Ali, a jamaat-e-Islami business tycoon, is considered to be its key financer and owns several business houses and media outlets, including the suspended Diganta TV channel. A five member Appellate Division bench, headed by Chief Justice Surendra Kumar Sinha, gave the verdict on Tuesday. Reportedly, Chief Counsel of Ali has revealed that the latter’s family is yet to take a decision on filing a clemency petition. The execution will be carried out after completion of due formalities according to the authorities.

The court rejected contentions of Mir Quasem’s counsel and held that ‘He does not deserve any leniency on the question of sentence on consideration of the nature and gravity of the offence’, ‘These crimes cannot be compared with ordinary crimes. They are of incomparable scale and seriousness’.

He was reportedly commander of the ruthlessly notorious Al-Badr Bahini group and was found to have made a $25 million deal with U.S. lobby firm Cassidy and Associates for engaging with the governments of the U.S. and Bangladesh to protect “his interest” and another deal worth of $50,000 for “condemning” the actions of the International Crimes Tribunal—Bangladesh, according to authorities.

 The ICTB, is Bangladesh’s war crimes tribunal was set up in 2009 to investigate and prosecute the suspects for the genocide committed in 1971 by the Pakistan Army and local affiliates. The tribunal has since meted out several death sentences to those accused of war crimes, which has come under the scanner of International Human Rights Organizations. The Jurist reported that UN Human Right experts have claimed that the Bangladesh government has failed to meet international standards of fair trial and due process of law in imposition of death penalty which include denying defence lawyers adequate time to prepare their cases, and arbitrarily limiting the number of witnesses they could call on

“The people of Bangladesh deserve justice for crimes committed during the War of Independence. The continued use of the death penalty will not achieve this. It only serves to inflame domestic tensions and further divide a society riven by violence,” said Champa Patel, Amnesty International’s South Asia Director reacting to Mir Quasem’s sentence.

 According to media reports, five people have been sentenced to death till now by the ICT. Motiur Rahman Nizami another leader of the Jamaat was executed in May for war crimes. Four others were sentenced to death earlier this year.

In this regard the learned counsel has drawn our attention to the charge and submits that the tribunal has framed charge against him as an abettor but this court has found him guilty as the principal offender of the charge and thereby this court has committed fundamental error in maintaining his sentence.

acceptable one in view of the fact that there is no direct evidence of his involvement in the killing of Jashim, and considering the petitioner’s status, his contribution towards the nation by setting up business conglomerate his sentence may be commuted. Learned counsel has

. It was observed that the tribunal awarded the sentence of death in respect of charge No.11, which according to us, was ‘proportionate to the gravity of the crime.’

This charge is relating to the killing of a young freedom fighter Jashim in Dalim Hotel, Chittagong town.

Read the Judgment here.

Next Story