Click Here To Read LiveLaw Hindi- The First Hindi Legal News Website

Contempt Petition In SC Against Prashant Bhushan On His Comments About Loya Case Judgment

A contempt petition has been filed in the Supreme Court against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and news channels, Aaj Tak and Times Now for allegedly making reckless imputations against Supreme Court judges and the judiciary as a whole.

The petition has been filed by five Lucknow-based Advocates—Ranjana Agnihotri, Bandana Kumar, Durgesh Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Kumar Verma, and Ashutosh Mishra. They take objection to certain comments made by Mr. Bhushan after the pronouncement of the judgments in the Sahara Birla Payoffs case and Judge Loya case.

The petition in fact alleges that it is “usual practice of Shri Prashant Bhushan to malign the Hon’ble Judges and the institution of judiciary if he fails to get favourable judgment from the court attributing reasons for passing the judgment/order against him.”

Mr. Bhushan, on behalf of Common Cause, had filed a petition seeking SIT probe into the matter of alleged payoffs by Birla Sahara Groups to the then Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi. The petition was however dismissed, with the court observing that “voluminous and detailed documents of payoffs” recovered by the authorities through raids are random loose sheets of paper, on the basis of which high public functionaries occupying important offices cannot be subjected to investigation.

The petitioners now point out that subsequent to the dismissal, Mr. Bhushan had made a statement to the Press, saying that the judgment “will go down as one of the worst judgment in the history” and that this was a “black day” in the history of the Supreme Court.

The petitioners have also placed reliance on Mr. Bhushan’s reaction to the supreme court judgment in case of Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India denying probe into the alleged foul play in CBI Special Judge BH Loya’s death. They assert that post the dismissal of the case, Mr. Bhushan “with a view to scandalize the judges and the institution of judiciary addressed the press in the lawns of the Supreme Court”. His statements were then broadcast throughout the day by Television News Channels Aaj Tak and Times Now, it states.

Taking objection to such statements made by Mr. Bhushan after the pronouncement of the two judgments, the petition asserts, “…the statement made by Shri Prasant Bhushan Advocate was widely criticized by legal fraternity throughout the country. There was great resentment within the advocates and also in the public regarding the derogatory remarks made by Shri Prashant Bhushan against the judiciary. The Petitioners were of the view that Shri Prasant Bhushan will not repeat the same thing and he will respect the judicial system and judiciary and he will refrain himself from making scrupulous remarks and any remark derogatory to the judicial system and that he would mend his ways.”

It therefore demands initiation of contempt proceedings against the Advocate and the news channels, contending that if action under the Contempt of Courts Act is not taken against them, “the tendency to scandalize the judiciary and to pressurize the judges for getting favourable order would continue unabated and may give rise for repeating the offence of the like nature.”

Additionally, the petition also seeks formulation of necessary guidelines for Advocates to regulate the statements made by them before or after any verdict or judicial proceeding.

Read the Petition Here

 

Got Something To Say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

  • p d amarnath says:

    Just the privileges if legislature and members of the parliament, the first thing to be done is to scrap the present contempt of court act. So long as the act in it’s present firm exists, anything can be interpreted to form contempt. In the absence of the magnanimity to accept different ideas, people tend to go to court on anything they don’t like and make it contempt. A criticism can’t be made into a contempt. If made, it will kill creativity and flourishing of new ideas, which will kill the society itself.

  • Ramesh Kumar Bamal Advocate says:

    Whether the CJI or other judge are not committing wrong with the public. In Haryana judiciary leak paper Punjab and Haryana Judges are doing well. The are prosecutor, complainant and judge of their own cause. Not only investigation but they are monitoring the trial also. SIT is investigating upto 3 persons whereas some senior judges are involved but to save them registrar recruitment made scapgoat.
    I never met Prashant Bhushan but you also know allegation of 40 crore against CJI kher were seriously leveled but everything has been managed

  • Jose says:

    The indian public still believes there was something fishy in the matter…One way these petitioners are helping dangerous tendencies suppressing freedom of judicial accountability…..

Top