Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2023

Nominal Index [Citation 223 – 266]Areeb Hasan Ansari Najeeb Hasan Ansari v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 223Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 224Arjun Amarjeet Rampal v. Union of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 225Sayli B Parkhi v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 226M/s Bharti Telemedia Ltd. v. State of Goa 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 227Anubha Shrivastava Sahai v. National Testing Agency 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 228L & T Finance Limited v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 229Gurumahima Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd v. M/s Admirecon Infrastructure Pvt Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 230Imran Iqbal Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 231Chanda Kochhar v. ICICI Bank Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 232Amol Ramesh Bole and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 233Rana Kapoor v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 234Palmview Investments Overseas Limited v. Ravi Arya 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 235Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Meta Platforms Inc. and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 236MV Golden Pride v. GAC Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 237Alice D'souza v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 238Buddheshwar S/o Babulal Lilhare v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 239XYZ v. ABC 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 240Sunil Wamanrao Sakore v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 241Everest Entertainment LLP v. Hridaynath D. Kadudeshmukh and Others 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 242Maherban Hasan Babu Khan v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 243Sunil Kumar Jindal v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 244Patanjali Foods Limited v. Meta Platforms Inc & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 245Pravin Naik v. Shrinivas Prabhu Dessai 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 246RNA Palazzo Residents Welfare Association v. East and West Builders and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 247Radheshyam Jangad v. Shanti Pralhad Sakla through Satish Sakla 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 248TML Business Services Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 249M/s. Aditi Constructions v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 250ABC v. XYZ 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 251Harish Kumar Garg v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 252Chanchal Bhagwatilal Gokhru v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 253Ashish Devidas Morkhade v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 254Nalini W/o Natthuji Shende v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 255Baliram S/o Reva Chavhan v. Gajanan S/o Shekrao Wanjare 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 256Joan Mascarenhas E D'Souza v. State of Goa 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 257Mahendra Dattu Gore v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 258Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Aman Sanjay Tak and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 259Kavita w/o. Waman Kokode vs Govt of Maha 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 260Robin Karamchandani v. Jem and Associates & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 261Pramod v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 262Sanville Adrian Dsouza Alias Sam Dsouza v. Union Of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 263Irfan Moiuddeen Saiyyed and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 264Pinkesh Dhiraj Patel and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 265Shubhash Waman Baviskar and Ors. v. Adinath Hambirrao Budhwant and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 266Reports/JudgmentsCaste Validity Certificates Obtained After Admission: Bombay High Court Orders One Time Regularisation Against Reserved SeatsCase Title: Areeb Hasan Ansari Najeeb Hasan Ansari v. State of MaharashtraCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 223The Bombay High Court regularized the admissions of students in various health science institutes as a one-time measure. The Admission Regulation Authority (ARA) had cancelled their admissions under reserved categories as they did not have validity certificates at the time of admission.A division bench of Justice Ravindra V Ghuge and Justice Sanjay A Deshmukh sitting at Aurangabad also imposed costs on the institutes for admitting the students against the rules and not communicating ARA's decision to the students.[Copyright Act] Bombay HC Restrains Radio Channels From Broadcasting Songs Without Equal Royalty To Authors, Says Position Of Law Prima Facie ChangedCase Title: Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 224The Bombay High Court temporarily restrained FM radio stations - Radio Tadka and Radio City from broadcasting songs authored by the members of Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS) without paying royalties to the authors.Justice Manish Pitale held that prima facie, the original authors (authors, composers, publishers etc.) of the literary or musical works used in films and sound recordings are entitled to royalties equal to the producer for utilization of their works. The court said that prima facie, due to a 2012 amendment in the Copyright Act, the original authors, who were earlier not entitled to royalty once their work became part of a film, can now...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2023

Amisha Shrivastava

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2023

Amisha Shrivastava

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers