Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: April 24 To April 30

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 338 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 355NOMINAL INDEXMS. NEETU NAGAR v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 338Alliance of Digital India Foundation v. Competition Commission of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 339Sanjay Mehra vs Sharad Mehra & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 340MANOJ KRISHAN AHUJA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 341Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs Malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 342PROUD SECURITIES AND CREDITS PRIVATE LIMITED v. URRSHILA KERKAR & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 343ANUSHKA SHARMA (MINOR) THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL FATHER, SH. JITENDER KUMAR SHARMA v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE) AND ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 344DIGITAL COLLECTIBLES PTE LTD AND ORS. v. GALACTUS FUNWARE TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 345MRS X v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 346LOKESH CHUGH v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 347RED CHILLIES ENTERTAINMENTS PVT LTD v. ASHOK KUMAR/JOHN DOE & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 348CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTATION v. S K GHOSH & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 349BURGER KING COMPANY LLC v. VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 350SWARARAJ @ RAJ SHRIKANT THAKERAY & ANR. v. STATE & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 351GDN v. GNCTD 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 352JASMINE SHAH v. DIRECTOR (PLANNING) GNCTD 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 353JASMINE SHAH v. DIRECTOR (PLANNING) GNCTD 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 353 Tehri Hydro Development Corporation India Limited vs M/s C. E. C. Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 354RAHUL MEHRA v. UNION OF INDIA 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 355Judgments/OrdersNo All India Judicial Service Exists, Judicial Officer Has To Complete Eligibility Criteria Of Service In Feeder Grade: Delhi High CourtTitle: MS. NEETU NAGAR v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 338Observing that there is no All India Judicial Service for judges, the Delhi High Court has observed that a judicial officer has to complete the prescribed eligibility criteria of service specified in the feeder grade of a particular State judicial service.A division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Saurabh Banerjee dismissed a plea of Neetu Nagar, a civil judge who voluntarily resigned from Haryana Civil Services in 2018 and joined Delhi Judicial Services after clearing the examination.Consider Start-Ups’ Applications Against Google’s New Payment Policy On Or Before April 26: Delhi High Court To CCITitle: Alliance of Digital India Foundation v. Competition Commission of India and Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 339The Delhi High Court directed the Competition Commission of India to take up the applications moved by an alliance of start-ups against Google’s new in-app user choice billing policy, and consider the same on or before April 26.Justice Tushar Rao Gedela pronounced the order on the plea moved by Alliance of Digital India Foundation, against the new policy. The plea had also sought direction on the tech giant to keep the same in abeyance till the issue is adjudicated by Competition Commission of India.Also Read: Proceedings Before Competition Commission Of India Won’t Be Invalidated Due To Vacancy Or Defect In Its Constitution: Delhi High CourtAgreement Is Linked With Family Settlement Which Contains Arbitration Clause - Delhi High Court Allows S. 8 Application To Refer Parties to ArbitrationCase Title: Sanjay Mehra vs Sharad Mehra & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 340The Delhi High Court has ruled that once there is an arbitration agreement governing the parties, the matter must be referred for arbitration unless there is a “chalk and cheese” case of non-arbitrability.The bench of Justice Jyoti Singh was dealing with an application filed under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) in a suit for infringement of Intellectual Property rights (IPR).‘Need For Safe Womb For Female Foetus’: Delhi High Court Issues Directions For Effective Implementation Of PCPNDT ActTitle: MANOJ KRISHAN AHUJA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 341The Delhi High Court has passed a slew of directions for effective implementation of the Pre-conception & Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, observing that there is a need for a “safe womb for female foetus.”Observing that the enactment has to be implemented with greater care and utilised by those who are affected, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said:“Sex-determination based abortion is a powerful method of perpetuating gender inequalities. The restriction of access to foetal sex information is directly related to the problem of misogyny, which affects women of all socioeconomic backgrounds not only in this country but globally as well. The purpose of controlling knowledge of sex or gender is to protect expectant women and their unborn child. Despite the fact that sex-selective abortion may not be immediately apparent in the present act, its primary objective is to address this issue.”Delhi...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: April 24 To April 30

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags