Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 08 To January 14, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 22 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 54NOMINAL INDEXUnion of India v. M/s Panacea Biotec Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 22MBL Infrastructure Ltd v. DMRC 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 23T.V.TODAY NETWORK LIMITED v. SAMEET THAKKAR & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 24M/S Angelantoni Test Technologies Srl V. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1(1)(1) & Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 25NILKANTH DAS AND ORS. v. CBSE AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 26Bar Council Of India Versus Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 27NIVEDITA JOSHI v. ABHISHEK RAY & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 28M/S BLUE HEAVEN COSMETICS PVT LTD v. MR ANISH JAIN TRADING AS M/S NAVKAR COSMO & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 29MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 30NEERAJ SINGAL v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 31MANNAT GROUP OF HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. M/S MANNAT DHABA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 32CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 33Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Versus M/S Bt Global Communications India Pvt. Ltd. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 34Amway India Enterprises Private Limited Versus Commissioner, Vat, Delhi & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 35KARAN S THUKRAL v. THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 36 X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 37A v. B 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 38 PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. v. KAVITHA KURUGANTI and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 39SAINT GURMEET RAM RAHIM SINGH INSAN SHISHAYEVA GADDINASHIN SHAH SATNAM SINGH JI MAHARAJ V/s YOUTUBE LLC AND ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 40COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. VIRENDRA SINGH ADVOCATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 41NOVARTIS AG v. NATCO PHARMA LIMITED & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 42HARDESH KUMAR v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 43ARIF KHAN v. THE STATE AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 44OJAS SATYAWALI THROUGH HIS MOTHER BHAWNA PATHAK v. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 45NASHETA ZAIDI THROUGH GUARDIAN GROUP CAPTAIN IMRAN H ZAIDI v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 46Kinadhan Chakma v Union of India and Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 47KAUM FAQEER SHAH v. MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 48Jatin Mohanty v. Election Commission of India & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 49MR. TARUN TEJPAL AND ANR v. MAJOR GENERAL M.S. AHLUWALIA AND ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 50CITIZENS FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 51M/S Een Een Sales Corporation Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 52VIPUL JAIN v. STATE THROUGH GOVT OF (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 53RAVI KAPOOR v. STATE-NCT OF DELHI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 54Section 34 Petition Is Non-Est If Filed Without The Arbitral Award: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Union of India v. M/s Panacea Biotec LimitedCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 22The Delhi High Court has held that non-filing of the arbitral award along with the petition under Section 34 of the A&C Act is a fatal defect which renders the filing as non-est.The bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna held that filing of an award along with the challenge petition is not an empty procedural requirement as sans the award, the Court is left absolutely clueless to comprehend the grounds taken in the objection Petition and thereby unable to decide whether the Petition merits Notice to be issued or outright rejection.Arbitral Tribunal Can Go Beyond To Grant Relief To Aggrieved Party When Contract Illegally Restricts Remedies : Delhi High CourtCase Title: MBL Infrastructure Ltd v. DMRC,Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 23The Delhi High Court has held that an Arbitral Tribunal can transgress the boundaries of the contract to grant relief to aggrieved party when the contract illegally restricts or does not provide for sufficient remedies.The bench of Justice Chandra Dhari Singh held that in a situation which is not anticipated in the agreement, the tribunal can transgress the boundaries of the agreement and grant relief to the aggrieved party which it is rightfully entitled to. It held that the tribunal cannot withhold a relief merely because of the explicit provision for such a relief in the agreement.Delhi High Court Holds 'X' User Guilty Of Contempt Of Court For Making 'Defamatory Tweets' Against TV Today Despite Restraint OrdersTitle: T.V.TODAY NETWORK LIMITED v. SAMEET THAKKAR & ANR.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 24The Delhi High Court recently held an 'X' (formerly 'Twitter') user guilty of committing contempt of court for making “defamatory tweets” against TV Today Network despite restraint orders passed against him in 2020.Justice Rekha Palli directed Thakkar to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh, taking into account that the offending tweets were removed by him and that he had tendered an unconditional apology for making the tweets.Investment In Shares In Indian Subsidiary 'Capital Account Transaction', Not...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 08 To January 14, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags