Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 31 - August 06

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 641 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 655NOMINAL INDEXSHABNAM v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 641 J. VINUTHA v. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES - AIIMS & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 642 SpiceJet Limited vs Kal Airways Pvt Ltd & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 643 MONK ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 644 RAVINDER SINGH BHASIN v. KANWALJIT KAUR & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 645 ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 646 B L Kashyap and Sons Ltd vs Emaar India Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 647 STATE (NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY) v. MOHD YASIN MALIK 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 648 VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 649 TEJASWI CHHATWAL & ORS. v. DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY DELHI AND ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 650 WHITEHAT EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED v. VINAY KUMAR SINGH 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 651 MOHD. YASIN PATEL ALIAS FALAHI v. STATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 652 PCIT Versus Maharani Enterprises 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 653 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Director of Legal Metrology & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 654 MANMOHAN SINGH @ MONU v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 655Conduct Survey Of All Pending Ration Card Applications For Decision On Food Security Allowance Under NFSA: High Court Directs Delhi GovtTitle: SHABNAM v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS and other connected matterCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 641The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to conduct a survey of all the pending applications for ration cards and decide if the persons will be entitled to receive the food security allowance.Justice Subramonium Prasad directed the Delhi Government to complete the exercise “as expeditiously as possible” and sought a status report on the same.“The State Government is, therefore, directed to conduct the survey of all pending applications to see as to whether they would be entitled to receive the allowance under Section 8 of the Food Security Act,” the court said.Permit OBC Category Candidate To Appear In Interview For Senior Resident Doctor Post: Delhi High Court To AIIMSTitle: J. VINUTHA v. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES - AIIMS & ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 642The Delhi High Court has directed AIIMS to permit a candidate, whose OBC certificate was initially rejected on the ground that it was not as per the prescribed format and later because the re-submission was beyond the cut off date, to appear in second stage interview for the post of senior resident doctor.Granting interim relief to the candidate who approached the court challenging the rejection of her candidature under OBC category during the selection process, Justice Chandra Dhari Singh said:“Prima facie, this Court finds force in the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner that the candidature of the petitioner for the Reserved Category post may not be rejected on the sole ground that the Caste Certificate of the petitioner was not in accordance with the prescribed format, especially when the same was issued by an authorised and competent authority.”Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Passed Against Spicejet In Favour Of Its Former Promoter Kalanithi MaranCase Title: SpiceJet Limited vs Kal Airways Pvt Ltd & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 643The Delhi High Court has upheld the 2018 arbitral award passed in favour of Kalanithi Maran, former promoter of SpiceJet, and his firm Kal Airways Pvt Ltd, in a share transfer dispute with the airline and its current promoter, Ajay Singh.Justice Chandra Dhari Singh has also dismissed Maran’s challenge to the award where his claim for damages and restitution of 58.46% shareholding in SpiceJet was rejected by the Tribunal.The dispute between the parties had arisen under a ‘Share Sale and Purchase Agreement’ (SSPA) executed between them in 2015, where Maran and his firm had sold their entire 58.46 per cent stake in SpiceJet to its co-founder, Singh. Ensure Availability Of Cloud Storage Service To Sub-Registrars For Preservation Of Documents: High Court To Delhi GovtTitle: MONK ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 644The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to ensure availability of Delhi Online Registration System (DORIS), a cloud storage server, to all Sub-Registrars for preservation of documents including those relating to land records.“For the said purpose the Principal Secretary (Revenue), GNCTD shall be personally responsible to ensure implementation of the DORIS system,” Justice Prathiba M Singh directed. Family Court Should Not Give Adjournment For Long Period While Referring Parties To Court Counsellor: Delhi High CourtTitle: RAVINDER SINGH BHASIN v. KANWALJIT KAUR & ORS.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 645The Delhi High Court has said that the family court should not give an adjournment...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 31 - August 06

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags