Top
News Updates

Delhi HC Issues Notice In Plea Seeking Extension of Notice Period To Submit Comments And Objections To Draft Policy On Environment Impact Assessment

Karan Tripathi
26 Jun 2020 10:37 AM GMT
Delhi HC Issues Notice In Plea Seeking Extension of Notice Period To Submit Comments And Objections To Draft Policy On Environment Impact Assessment
x
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Delhi High Court has issued notice in a plea seeking a direction to be issued to the Central Government to extend the notice period for receiving public comments/suggestions on the draft Environment Impact Assessment policy till September 30 or till the time COVID19 restrictions subsists.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan has issued notice to the Union of India through the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change.

Filed by Mr Tongad, the petition challenges the notice period provided in the notification issued by the Environment Ministry on March 23 wherein a notice period has been provided for the public to send their comments and suggestions on the draft EIA policy.

In light of the COVID19 lockdown, an extension notification was passed which had increased the notice period till June 30. However, the Petitioner believes that the said extension is 'woefully inadequate' as the COVID cases are still on the rise and restrictions continue to remain in place in major cities.

For instance, the Petitioner has highlighted that the postal services in Delhi and Mumbai are still suspended. As per the Petitioner, this would prevent many people from sending their objections to the concerned Ministry.

While highlighting that the public has a fundamental right to participate and comment upon public policy, the Petitioner has argued that the fact that the draft policy is only available in English, it adversely affects the meaningful participation of the public in the draft policy.

The petition says:

'Moreover, the notification is largely inaccessible online as it is only in English and has not been posted prominently on the website of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, apart from not having been posted on the websites of various State Pollution Control Boards or any Environment Department websites of any of the States. As a result of this, the members of public have been unable to comment on a substantive notification that completely supersedes and replaces the existing environmental norms.'

Therefore, the Petitioner has asked for a direction to be issued to the concerned Ministry to facilitate a fair and meaningful consultation, the notification needs to be translated into all official vernacular languages as given in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, and placed at a prominent position on the MoEF & CC website as well as the websites of the Central and State Pollution Control Board and the Environment Ministries of all the States.

The Petitioner has further argued that the draft policy has multiple features, such as post-facto clearances, reduction in public consultation time, which needs to be properly addressed by three public at large as it seriously affects their rights.

While asking the court to intervene, the Petitioner has said:

'The present Petition is being filed to protect the rights of the persons of India to a clean environment and human health and their right to community participation guaranteed to them under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as well as under the provisions of the EP Act, 1986 and the Regulations thereunder.'

Next Story