Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 18 To April 23, 2022

CITATIONS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 333 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 360NOMINAL INDEXCase Title: Asifa v. State of NCT of Delhi 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 333Case Title: RISHU AGGARWAL v. MOHIT GOYAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 334Case Title: Neha Pudil v. Union of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 335Title: SNAPDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. GODADDYCOM LLC AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 336Case Title: LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED & ANR. v. SATBIR BHARDWAJ & ORS.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 337Case Title: INDRA PASRICHA v. DEEPIKA CHAUHAN & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 338Case Title: KINRI DHIR v. VEER SINGH 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 339Case Title: RAJA BERWA & ORS v. STATE & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 340Case title: M. Nageswara Rao v. Union of India and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 341Case Title: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. STATE 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 342Case Title: SHRI KUSUM LATA v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 343Case Title: DR. MANOJ BAJPAI v. MS SEEMA JASSAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 344Case Title: X v. Y 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 345Case Title: APURV SHANKAR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 346Case Title: Delhi Development Authority v. Watcon Water Specialists Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 347Case Title: DR S S CHAHAR v. SH D K SARRAF & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 348Case Title: SHILPA SINGH v. VIKAS KHANNA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 349Case Title: Court on its own motion v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 350Case Title: National Highways Authority of India versus M/S Abhijeet Angul Sambalpur Toll Road Limited 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 351Case Title: SOURABH GUGNANI & ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 352Case Title: BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD v. PARLE BISCUITS PVT. LTD & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 353Case Title: ASHUTOSH SINGH v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 354Case Title: NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR v. OM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & ANR and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 355Case Title: SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH, AN INSTITUTE DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 356Case Title: VISTRAT REAL ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASIAN HOTELS NORTH LTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 357Case Title: VEENA GARG v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 358Case Title: MR BHAVANISHANKAR H SHARMA THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SH SATISH KUMAR TIWARI v. SRS PRIVATE INVESTMENT POWAI LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR ROHIT DAVE & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 359Case Title: ULTIMATE INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 3601. Jahangirpuri Violence: Delhi High Court Orders Production Of Juvenile Accused Before Juvenile Justice BoardCase Title: Asifa v. State of NCT of DelhiCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 333The Delhi High Court has ordered the production before a juvenile justice board, of an accused claiming to be a juvenile aged 16 years, arrested in connection with the clashes that broke out last week in city's Jahangirpuri area during a Hanuman Jayanti procession.The juvenile accused was sent to one day police custody remand here by a Duty Magistrate of Rohini Courts recently.A bench comprising of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar was dealing with a habeas corpus plea filed by a woman, asserting that her minor brother in law was kept in unlawful detention without proper disclosure of his age, despite being 16 years only.2. Denial Of Conjugal Relationship Ground For Divorce But Not 'Exceptional Hardship' To Waive Cooling Off Period U/S 14 Hindu Marriage Act: Delhi HCCase Title: RISHU AGGARWAL v. MOHIT GOYALCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 334The Delhi High Court has held that though denial of conjugal relationship is a ground for divorce and tantamounts to cruelty, the same cannot be said to amount to "exceptional hardship" under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955.Section 14 prescribes a mandatory 1 year waiting period from the date of marriage, before filing for divorce. A proviso to this Section states that the 1 year period may be waived off on the ground that the case is one of "exceptional hardship" to the petitioner or of "exceptional depravity" on the part of the respondent.A bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Jasmeet Singh observed that the denial of sex by one spouse to the other, or by both of them to each other may certainly constitute "hardship", but it cannot be said to be "exceptional hardship".3. Delhi High Court Tells Centre To Explore Possibility Of Physically Disabled Candidates Being Able To Pursue Some Disciplines Of Medical EducationCase Title: Neha Pudil v. Union of India & Ors.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 335The Delhi High Court has directed the National Medical Commission to explore, in consultation with Central Government, the possibility of physically disabled candidates being able to pursue some disciplines of medical education with the advancement of science and technology, in the next six months.A division bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Vipin...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 18 To April 23, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags