Karnataka HC Upholds Validity Of Amendment To KTTP Act Allowing Reservation For SC/ST Category In Public Works Tender Process [Read Judgment]

Karnataka High Court while dismissing a petition filed by a public works contractor, has upheld the amendment brought to section 6 of the Karnataka Transparency In Public Procurements (KTTP) Act, 1999, thereby making reservation in process of Tenders, for Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribe category. Justice B Verrappa while dismissing the petition filed by Vishwanath H M who had sought to declare the amendment as ultra vires of Constituton and be quashed said "Centuries of calculated oppression and habbitual submission reduced a considerable section of our community to a life of serfdom. It would be well nigh impossible to raise their standards if the doctrine of equal opportunity was strictly enforced in their case. Therefore the impugned amendments brought no way prejudice the case of the petitioner nor vitiate the Fundamental rights guranteed under Part III of the Constitution of India." Case background: KTPP Act came into force w.e.f 4.10.2000. Intended to streamline procedure in public procurement and also ensure accountability in public procurement. The State Government, while making it mandatory for all the procurement agencies under the Government to follow the tendering process in public procurement. The provisions of Section-6 of the KTPP Act, 1999 specifies that no tender shall be invited, processed or accepted by a Procurement Entity after the commencement of this Act except in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Act or the Rules made thereunder. the provisions of As per the amendment Section – 6 of the KTPP Act by the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (Amendment) Act, 2016 and also Rule 27(A) in the KTPP Rules by the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (Amendment) Rules-2017, as a result of which certain reservation is created in the process of Tender, for the benefit of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories. In terms of the amendment, the Tender Inviting Authority has to reserve 17.15% of the works to the Scheduled Castes category and 6.95% of works to the Scheduled Tribes Category in the construction works, value of which does not exceed Rs.50,00,000. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court challenging the said amendments. Petitioner argued: The Constitution of India while making reservation provided social, economic and educational & cultural safeguards to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories under Articles 17, 46 and 15(4) of the Constitution of India respectively. It is also contended that Articles 243D, 243T, 330 and 332 of the Constitution of India provided the political safeguards and Articles 16(4), 16(4A) and 16(4B) provided the service safeguards and Article 164 provided other safeguards to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories. In view of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, every citizen has a right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. The amendment brought by the respondents violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and therefore, deserves to be struck down as ultra vires of the Constitution of India. The amendment brought is in violation of the fundamental rights and does not confirm to constitutional principles and is discriminatory. The amendment is arbitrary and hence violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and it has to be struck down as ultra vires of the Constitution on the ground of arbitrariness or discrimination. State opposed the petition by arguing: The petition is not maintainable either in law or on facts and the same is liable to be dismissed. It is further stated by the respondents that the Legislation based on the principles of distributive justice, protect the interests of weaker sections of the people, in particular, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under the provisions of Article 46 of the Constitution of India. Article-46 empowers the State to promote with special care, the economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. It is further contended that the impugned Legislation is brought to minimize in-equalities, distributive its largess to the weaker sections and to make socio-economic justice a reality and meaningful to make life worth living with dignity. The State is entitled to legislate for upliftment of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Moreover, it was said that providing reservation in Government contracts to the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes would also achieve the constitutional objectives of rendering socio-economic justice, which in turn improve their economic status, so that their economic development is improved. Intervenors supporting the amendements argued that "It is well settled that reservations in...

Karnataka HC Upholds Validity Of Amendment To KTTP Act Allowing Reservation For SC/ST Category In Public Works Tender Process [Read Judgment]

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mustafa Plumber

Karnataka HC Upholds Validity Of Amendment To KTTP Act Allowing Reservation For SC/ST Category In Public Works Tender Process [Read Judgment]

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers