Oddness of odd-even Formula

Ashok KM
1 Jan 2016 7:05 AM GMT
Oddness of odd-even Formula
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Will Delhi Traffic Police go and penalize a Common man driving his ‘odd numbered’ car on an ‘even day’ in Delhi Roads because the Chief Minister and his Government thinks I am polluting the environment by using it on a day I like it to use?”

From today onwards, Traffic cops in Delhi might perhaps be more obsessed about number plates than about anything else. The Government, which the Delhites overwhelmingly voted to power, has asked its people to use odd numbered Cars on odd days and even numbered ones on even days. The cops are told to make those who violate these ‘orders’, pay Rs. 2000 as penalty. Many are excited about these environment friendly orders, and some other feel it is odd and this author falls into latter group.

Environmental concerns apart, there is something in constitution which says that all of us, as citizens of India, has right to move freely throughout the territory of India and of course this right is subject to some reasonable restrictions.  The state can indeed make laws restricting this freedom of movement in interests of the general public and this ‘order’ by Delhi Government is justified by some as a ‘reasonable restriction’.

Apex Court on freedom of movement

It is apt to go through some Apex Court decision which dealt with ‘reasonable restrictions’ on freedom of movement.  In Ajay Canu vs. Union Of India AIR 1988 SC 2027 the Apex Court dismissed the challenge against compulsion for the wearing of a helmet by the driver of two-wheeler vehicleand said ‘even assuming that the impugned rule has put a restriction on the exercise of a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(d) such restriction being in the interest of the general public,is a reasonable restriction protectedby Article 19(5) of the Constitution.’

In  Saghir Ahmad v. State of U. P., AIR 1954 SC 728, the Constitution bench of the Apex Court,  held that right of the public to use motor vehicles on the public road cannot be regarded as a right created by the Motor Vehicles Act, but that right exists anterior to any legislation.The Court had also said “Once the position is accepted that a member of the public is entitled to ply motor vehicles on the public road as an incident of his right of passage over highway, the question is really immaterial whether he plies a vehicle for pleasure or pastime or for the purpose of trade and business.

With regard to the above rulings of Apex court, it can be safely said that right to ply motor vehicles on public road is a fundamental right and restriction can be imposed on this right only if it is in interest of general public. Let us examine the odd-even scheme in this context.

Oddness of Odd even scheme

Suppose a Delhite, wants to receive his special guest (who is coming for the first time in the Capital) by his ‘odd numbered’ car on an ‘even’ day, will this rule permit him to do so?  Now, this man might be a person who uses his Car rarely and uses it only for the purposes like the one mentioned above. How is restricting him ‘reasonable’? To put it other way, if a person who uses his car very rarely and uses public transport more often, will it not be odd to ask him not to use his car on his special ‘even’ day when he wants to use it? The man who uses his ‘even numbered’ car on a special ‘odd’ day might be less polluting and more environment friendly than the one who religiously follows this ‘order’ of the Government.

The Government can indeed ask people to avoid the vehicles which are proved to be causing more toxic emissions. It can certainly ‘encourage’ its people to use public transport more often. But I believe, India as a democratic country, grants its citizen the liberty to choose when he should drive the vehicle he bought using his money and for the use of which, he pays tax to the Government.

Exempting two wheelers makes it even odder.

According to India Today report there are over 55 lakh two-wheelers including motorbikes and scooters as compared to over 27 lakh private cars in Delhi. According to the Centre for Science and Environment, two-wheelers account for 31 per cent of the pollution while other four-wheeler vehicles are responsible for 20 per cent of vehicular pollution. If the objective of restricting the vehicle is to prevent pollution, there seems to be no logic in exempting the two wheelers from this rule. Why should two wheelers have all the fun, people may ask and would eventually make people prefer two wheelers which would only result in more pollution.

Right to choice of when to use one’s own vehicle

Recently many activists have rightly condemned the Maharashtra Government restricting their right to choice of their food and the challenge against meat-ban is being heard by Bombay High Court.  Right to freedom of choice to use those things which I bought legally using my own hard earned money is indeed fundamental.  Government can prevent me from buying it, but it cannot ask me not to use it when I need it. I believe if some Delhite asks the Chief Minister of Delhi that “Will Delhi Traffic Police go and penalize a Common Mandriving his ‘odd numbered’ car on an ‘even day’ in Delhi Roads because the Chief Minister and his Government thinks I am polluting the environment by using it on a day I like or prefer it to use?”, he will be as justified as the Chief Minister who used it in context of right to choice of food.

Next Story
Share it